Das Weiße Haus sagt, die Aufhängung von Habeas Corpus zur Beschleunigung der Massenabschiebungen ist offen für Diskussionen

    https://www.nysun.com/article/white-house-says-suspending-writ-of-habeas-corpus-to-speed-up-mass-deportations-is-open-to-discussion?member_gift=CUZ5qwd3crq4pmz-xrd

    Share.

    25 Kommentare

    1. TheNewYorkSun on

      The White House says it is open to the idea of suspending the writ of habeas corpus — or the right to challenge one’s detention — for migrants as the administration looks to speed up its mass deportation operation. The admission came on Monday morning as border tsar Tom Homan took to the White House press podium to highlight the administration’s efforts to deport migrants charged with crimes in the United States. 

      Read more: [https://www.nysun.com/article/white-house-says-suspending-writ-of-habeas-corpus-to-speed-up-mass-deportations-is-open-to-discussion?member_gift=CUZ5qwd3crq4pmz-xrd](https://www.nysun.com/article/white-house-says-suspending-writ-of-habeas-corpus-to-speed-up-mass-deportations-is-open-to-discussion?member_gift=CUZ5qwd3crq4pmz-xrd)

    2. Ancient_Popcorn on

      The Writ of Habeas Corpus is what allows you to get a court appearance. It forces the government to allow you to challenge the allegations against you.

      Suspending this, for any reason, is tantamount to treason in a democracy.

    3. PsychLegalMind on

      The Constitution explicitly states that the privilege of habeas corpus shall not be suspended unless in extraordinary circumstances like rebellion or invasion where the public safety is at stake. He can certainly push the envelope, Martial Law next. He will say we have been invaded by the aliens [not the kind from outer space].

    4. Paulie_Walnuts1984 on

      “Suspending Emancipation Proclamation will also speed things up!”

      -Ellen Musk

    5. Cat_herder_81 on

      Anyone who supports this idea is a traitor to the constitution and to the US, and should be treated as such.

    6. apocalyptic_mystic on

      HIRE FIVE THOUSAND NEW IMMIGRATION JUDGES

      If the administration was serious about protecting citizens‘ rights, that’s what they’d do. Or some similarly large number. Yes, it would be expensive. Yes, those judges need training – develop a program to pay for law school student loans if they work as an immigration judge for X length of time. Try and think of solutions that protect the rights of Americans instead of immediately giving up and saying it’s not possible.

    7. seems like the Constitution is up for discussion with these people too. All that screaming they did during the Biden administration apparently means nothing now.

    8. Maybe you need to hear this, but I think you got the second amendment to defend yourself from this.
      Maybe you should use it before you can’t.

    9. Trump can’t suspend Habeas Corpus on his own.

      From [here](https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/habeas_corpus#:~:text=A%20writ%20of%20habeas%20corpus,holds%20the%20defendant%20in%20custody.):

      „The sources of habeas corpus can be found in the Constitution , statutory law, and case law . The Suspension Clause of the Constitution (Article I, Section 9, Clause 2) , states: “The Privileges of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.” Although the Constitution does not specifically create the right to habeas corpus relief, federal statutes provide federal courts with the authority to grant habeas relief to state prisoners. Only Congress has the power to suspend the writ of habeas corpus, either by its own affirmative actions or through an express delegation to the Executive. The Executive does not have the independent authority to suspend the writ.“

    10. From the [Library of Congress](https://www.loc.gov/exhibits/magna-carta-muse-and-mentor/writ-of-habeas-corpus.html):
      > King John’s Magna Carta guaranteed to all free men immunity from illegal imprisonment, a guarantee that has traditionally been invoked by way of the writ of habeas corpus. Under the concept of habeas corpus in Anglo-American jurisprudence, persons who are deprived of their liberty have the right to challenge the legality of their arrest or detention through a judicial inquiry. Habeas corpus is a Latin phrase meaning “produce the body.” By means of the writ of habeas corpus a court may order the state to “produce the body,” or hand over a prisoner so that it might review the legality of the prisoner’s detention.

      > Although King John’s Magna Carta did guarantee protection from unlawful imprisonment, it did not establish a process by which a person might sue for his freedom. The association between Magna Carta’s protection and the writ of habeas corpus only took root in the seventeenth century following the conflict between the House of Commons and King Charles I, after which the writ of habeas corpus became one of the most important privileges associated with English liberties. It was reaffirmed in the Habeas Corpus Acts of 1640 and 1679 and appears frequently in discussions of constitutional rights throughout the era leading to American independence. It is one of the fundamental liberties mentioned in the body of the United States Constitution.

    11. SmellsLikeBu11shit on

      Can we skip to the Nuremberg trials of these assholes? So sick of this shit

    12. Rattus-NorvegicUwUs on

      Treasonous.

      Add it to the list of bullshit the GOP has looked the other way at.

      The only reasons they would act like this is if they don’t think it would be used against them. Be ready to have to fight for your nation, they are trying to burn it to the ground.

    13. Guys, this is moving fast. This is their „trial balloon“ for how we will react, which preempts us to obey when they finally do it.

      We have weeks not years.

    14. The Constitution: Article I, Section 9, Clause 2;

      >***The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended***, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.

    15. The right to a trial gives us a reason to not resist arrest. It gives the average citizen an expectation they will see a judge before being locked away forever. Remove that guarantee and you no longer have a citizenry that can be confident they won’t die if they don’t resist.

      Violence against cops will go up astronomically.

    16. My first year of studying law, the teacher was adamant that this concept was the basic of modern law and what separates us from monarchy. Is that incorrect?

    17. Trump read about Hitler proposing The Enabling Act of 1933 and thought it was a great idea. The White House is already acting like the equivalent of the Reichstag Fire Decree was implemented….

    18. This is what ex-Philippine President/dictator Ferdinand Marcos Sr. did in 1972 when he proclaimed Martial Law.

    Leave A Reply