Share.

    37 Kommentare

    1. Colonel-Mooseknuckle on

      Why don’t we start with something that is actually possible. Age limits, and if you don’t show up to work for 30 days, you are automatically removed from office.

    2. ItsallaboutProg on

      Can we just focus on expanding the house? Constitutional changes are really hard right now.

    3. The Senate is extraordinarily important piece of the legislature. It’s essentially what gives the States semi-independence from the Federal Government which is VERY important.

      What the USA has that representative governments on say Europe doesn’t have is the strict separation of federal authority vs. State authority.

      Without State representation you would see even more federal overreach than we do now.

      I’m super liberal, and am on board with like 90% of that agenda but abolishing the Senate just isnt it.

    4. charlie_marlow on

      If we’re going that far, let’s go one step further and uncap the House. We put states over people with the current system, and eliminating the Senate along with uncapping the the House would allow the individual to gain more representation in the federal government.

      The current winds seem to be blowing towards making states largely superfluous, anyway, with all of the rulings that seem to be allowing the federal government to trounce all over state’s rights.

    5. FlexFanatic on

      Abolishing the Senate requires increasing House Representation. This is a must.

    6. Immediate_Thought656 on

      Jesus Christ. How in the fuck is this even on the list of shit you think Americans need?

      Let’s push for achievable goals, not those that the right will use against Dems to show how fkn nuts they are.

    7. America’s political system was built to protect the status quo. The Senate is a big part of this with its staggered 6 year terms.

    8. I mean sure but it isn’t going to happen. It’s a silly thing to invest too much time and effort into this since it’s a nearly impossible task.

    9. This is such an insane thing to latch onto all of a sudden sure it’s broken but it is literally unconstitutional to do anything about it. Not even a normal 2/3 amendment approval would get it done which already is an impossible bar. explicitly every single state would need to approve this. Please focus on achievable goals

    10. This is like Defund the Police. You’re just giving the right ammunition to make you look like a bunch of crazies. I honestly think this is a Russian Psy-Op.

    11. In order to get rid of the Senate, you would need a constitutional amendment that first must past 2/3 vote of House AND Senate. You think the Senate is going to vote to abolish itself?

      Even if you get that far, it would have to be approved by 3/4 of the states. In the current political climate, you couldn’t get 3/4 of the states to agree that water is wet. Age limits and term limits have the same problem.

      The „easiest“ reform you could do is amend the Apportionment Act of 1911, which set the number of House representatives and how they are allocated. You wouldn’t need a constitutional amendment, but there doesn’t seem like there’s been any serious push for this. Smaller states aren’t going to be keen to see their influence diminished, whether they’re red, blue or purple.

      Edit: As others have pointed out, it is actually impossible to get rid of the Senate unless all 50 states agree.

    12. GeorgeKaplanIsReal on

      No, we really should not.

      The senate and the filibuster are the only reason why the SAVE Act is not federal law.

    13. This is so fucking stupid, anyone that supports getting rid of the senate should be laughed out of the room like the fucking idiot they are.

    14. Agreed, their endless embrace of the filibuster is all the evidence we need that they don’t need to exist. Combine it with a new law stating no Congressperson can represent more than 500k and expand the house appropriately

    15. If there were no Senate the Save Act would be going to Trump’s desk for signing right now.

    16. pewpewmcpistol on

      How well do you all think statements like this do outside of the reddit bubble? Think with an ounce of strategy for once.

    17. FeedbackParticular59 on

      I feel this way too. 18 percent of the country elects 52 Senators so Pieces of excrement like Mitch McConnell can block all progressive positive legislation, while representing 18 percent of the voting population. Soon 15 states will have 70 percent of the US population. So 30 senators for 70 percent of the population while 70 senators for 30 percent of the population in the US Senate. Meaning states like Wyoming, Alaska, and Kentucky can ruin even more lives with their 2 senators each for a population of under 3 million people.

    18. make_me_breakfast on

      The problem is that requires a constitutional convention and I absolutely do not trust the people in power currently to be allowed to do anything with that.

    19. lol what? Oh, it’s just the jacobin. But so much for DSA backing off from their crazy ideas

    20. partsguy850 on

      You better come up with a solid new system before you go tearing stuff down. I’d hate for us to make a ‘tear it down to put up a ballroom’ type of mistake.

    21. IronyElSupremo on

      .. and Sabrina Carpenter w/Olivia Rodrigo should parachute into my private compound with a pallet of whipped cream and strawberries too (avoid the fleet of Range Rovers, please).

      Unfortunately there’s .. reality (aka the double wide trailer, case of PBRs bought on sale, and that lascivious heavily tatted grandma who’s single for the 14th time).

    22. Term limits, term limits, term limits. Cognitive and physical health screenings every year for all of Congress

    23. Under the Constitution, this can’t even get done with an Amendment. It would take all 50 states to agree. The smaller ones have no incentive to do so. Tough to do without armed revolution.

    24. AdmirableComposer140 on

      This is stupid as fuck and borderline authoritarian depending on what you mean when you say get rid of the senate. This shit is also on the DSA’s platform and it doesn’t need to be because it just tarnishes all the actual good stuff on there.

    25. That_Polish_Guy_927 on

      Before you downvote, I’m genuinely curious because I don’t follow into things too deeply, this is not an attack on the idea.

      What would this achieve in the long run? The two legislative chambers were designed to work together to get things done. Yeah it’s a broken system right now, but what would only having the House do?

      There is something big that I’m missing here, but I can’t figure it out- please someone walk me through the process.

    26. Vindicare605 on

      These headlines are so stupid. How? How do you abolish the Senate? The only way that happens is with a Constitutional ammendment and the ONLY way that is gonna happen is if 3/4 of the state legislatures ratify it, because that’s never gonna happen in Congress you are never going to get 2/3rds of the Senate to agree to abolish itself. And even if you COULD get an ammendment passed to abolish the Senate, you’d need to also get a unanimous conensus of every State’s legislature and that would never happen.

      The entire thought experiment is an exercise is pointless stupidity.

      Besides, there’s a better solution to both the gridlock in the Senate and the disappropriate representation of large states that can both legally be done. Uncap the House of Representatives (seriously the reasoning for it being capped is hilariously stupid and shortsighted) and then add Puerto Rico and Washington DC as states. Both of those solutions are actually possible to do and would solve a LOT of our representation problems.

    Leave A Reply