I’m all for abolishing the senate and the electoral college.
Colonel-Mooseknuckle on
Why don’t we start with something that is actually possible. Age limits, and if you don’t show up to work for 30 days, you are automatically removed from office.
ItsallaboutProg on
Can we just focus on expanding the house? Constitutional changes are really hard right now.
kidcrumb on
The Senate is extraordinarily important piece of the legislature. It’s essentially what gives the States semi-independence from the Federal Government which is VERY important.
What the USA has that representative governments on say Europe doesn’t have is the strict separation of federal authority vs. State authority.
Without State representation you would see even more federal overreach than we do now.
I’m super liberal, and am on board with like 90% of that agenda but abolishing the Senate just isnt it.
Responsible-Room-645 on
Hear me out, what if the Senate just did its job?
charlie_marlow on
If we’re going that far, let’s go one step further and uncap the House. We put states over people with the current system, and eliminating the Senate along with uncapping the the House would allow the individual to gain more representation in the federal government.
The current winds seem to be blowing towards making states largely superfluous, anyway, with all of the rulings that seem to be allowing the federal government to trounce all over state’s rights.
FlexFanatic on
Abolishing the Senate requires increasing House Representation. This is a must.
Immediate_Thought656 on
Jesus Christ. How in the fuck is this even on the list of shit you think Americans need?
Let’s push for achievable goals, not those that the right will use against Dems to show how fkn nuts they are.
Purify5 on
America’s political system was built to protect the status quo. The Senate is a big part of this with its staggered 6 year terms.
MetalEnthusiast83 on
Maybe try to win a fucking election first.
ItsEaster on
I mean sure but it isn’t going to happen. It’s a silly thing to invest too much time and effort into this since it’s a nearly impossible task.
Hungry_Shake6943 on
Calm down Palpatine
shafty17 on
This is such an insane thing to latch onto all of a sudden sure it’s broken but it is literally unconstitutional to do anything about it. Not even a normal 2/3 amendment approval would get it done which already is an impossible bar. explicitly every single state would need to approve this. Please focus on achievable goals
IceNein on
This is like Defund the Police. You’re just giving the right ammunition to make you look like a bunch of crazies. I honestly think this is a Russian Psy-Op.
rossww2199 on
In order to get rid of the Senate, you would need a constitutional amendment that first must past 2/3 vote of House AND Senate. You think the Senate is going to vote to abolish itself?
Even if you get that far, it would have to be approved by 3/4 of the states. In the current political climate, you couldn’t get 3/4 of the states to agree that water is wet. Age limits and term limits have the same problem.
The „easiest“ reform you could do is amend the Apportionment Act of 1911, which set the number of House representatives and how they are allocated. You wouldn’t need a constitutional amendment, but there doesn’t seem like there’s been any serious push for this. Smaller states aren’t going to be keen to see their influence diminished, whether they’re red, blue or purple.
Edit: As others have pointed out, it is actually impossible to get rid of the Senate unless all 50 states agree.
GeorgeKaplanIsReal on
No, we really should not.
The senate and the filibuster are the only reason why the SAVE Act is not federal law.
rigatony96 on
This is so fucking stupid, anyone that supports getting rid of the senate should be laughed out of the room like the fucking idiot they are.
strolpol on
Agreed, their endless embrace of the filibuster is all the evidence we need that they don’t need to exist. Combine it with a new law stating no Congressperson can represent more than 500k and expand the house appropriately
mrbaggy on
If there were no Senate the Save Act would be going to Trump’s desk for signing right now.
pewpewmcpistol on
How well do you all think statements like this do outside of the reddit bubble? Think with an ounce of strategy for once.
epsilon1856 on
Y’all are fuckin nuts if you really think this is a good idea
FeedbackParticular59 on
I feel this way too. 18 percent of the country elects 52 Senators so Pieces of excrement like Mitch McConnell can block all progressive positive legislation, while representing 18 percent of the voting population. Soon 15 states will have 70 percent of the US population. So 30 senators for 70 percent of the population while 70 senators for 30 percent of the population in the US Senate. Meaning states like Wyoming, Alaska, and Kentucky can ruin even more lives with their 2 senators each for a population of under 3 million people.
jetpacksforall on
Jacobin, seriously? Anyway because of the Suffrage Clause the Senate cannot be abolished by constitutional amendment. It would require agreement and ratification by 100% of the states.
“No State, without its consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.”
Can we focus on things that are even remotely reasonable as a possibility?
make_me_breakfast on
The problem is that requires a constitutional convention and I absolutely do not trust the people in power currently to be allowed to do anything with that.
airbear13 on
lol what? Oh, it’s just the jacobin. But so much for DSA backing off from their crazy ideas
[deleted] on
[deleted]
partsguy850 on
You better come up with a solid new system before you go tearing stuff down. I’d hate for us to make a ‘tear it down to put up a ballroom’ type of mistake.
JordyNelson12 on
Well that’s a sure way to cost Democrats votes.
IronyElSupremo on
.. and Sabrina Carpenter w/Olivia Rodrigo should parachute into my private compound with a pallet of whipped cream and strawberries too (avoid the fleet of Range Rovers, please).
Unfortunately there’s .. reality (aka the double wide trailer, case of PBRs bought on sale, and that lascivious heavily tatted grandma who’s single for the 14th time).
Roma1896 on
Term limits, term limits, term limits. Cognitive and physical health screenings every year for all of Congress
Hoops-23 on
Under the Constitution, this can’t even get done with an Amendment. It would take all 50 states to agree. The smaller ones have no incentive to do so. Tough to do without armed revolution.
AdmirableComposer140 on
This is stupid as fuck and borderline authoritarian depending on what you mean when you say get rid of the senate. This shit is also on the DSA’s platform and it doesn’t need to be because it just tarnishes all the actual good stuff on there.
Source_Required on
What a stupid statement.
mhizzle on
America needs total constitutional reform
That_Polish_Guy_927 on
Before you downvote, I’m genuinely curious because I don’t follow into things too deeply, this is not an attack on the idea.
What would this achieve in the long run? The two legislative chambers were designed to work together to get things done. Yeah it’s a broken system right now, but what would only having the House do?
There is something big that I’m missing here, but I can’t figure it out- please someone walk me through the process.
Vindicare605 on
These headlines are so stupid. How? How do you abolish the Senate? The only way that happens is with a Constitutional ammendment and the ONLY way that is gonna happen is if 3/4 of the state legislatures ratify it, because that’s never gonna happen in Congress you are never going to get 2/3rds of the Senate to agree to abolish itself. And even if you COULD get an ammendment passed to abolish the Senate, you’d need to also get a unanimous conensus of every State’s legislature and that would never happen.
The entire thought experiment is an exercise is pointless stupidity.
Besides, there’s a better solution to both the gridlock in the Senate and the disappropriate representation of large states that can both legally be done. Uncap the House of Representatives (seriously the reasoning for it being capped is hilariously stupid and shortsighted) and then add Puerto Rico and Washington DC as states. Both of those solutions are actually possible to do and would solve a LOT of our representation problems.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
37 Kommentare
I’m all for abolishing the senate and the electoral college.
Why don’t we start with something that is actually possible. Age limits, and if you don’t show up to work for 30 days, you are automatically removed from office.
Can we just focus on expanding the house? Constitutional changes are really hard right now.
The Senate is extraordinarily important piece of the legislature. It’s essentially what gives the States semi-independence from the Federal Government which is VERY important.
What the USA has that representative governments on say Europe doesn’t have is the strict separation of federal authority vs. State authority.
Without State representation you would see even more federal overreach than we do now.
I’m super liberal, and am on board with like 90% of that agenda but abolishing the Senate just isnt it.
Hear me out, what if the Senate just did its job?
If we’re going that far, let’s go one step further and uncap the House. We put states over people with the current system, and eliminating the Senate along with uncapping the the House would allow the individual to gain more representation in the federal government.
The current winds seem to be blowing towards making states largely superfluous, anyway, with all of the rulings that seem to be allowing the federal government to trounce all over state’s rights.
Abolishing the Senate requires increasing House Representation. This is a must.
Jesus Christ. How in the fuck is this even on the list of shit you think Americans need?
Let’s push for achievable goals, not those that the right will use against Dems to show how fkn nuts they are.
America’s political system was built to protect the status quo. The Senate is a big part of this with its staggered 6 year terms.
Maybe try to win a fucking election first.
I mean sure but it isn’t going to happen. It’s a silly thing to invest too much time and effort into this since it’s a nearly impossible task.
Calm down Palpatine
This is such an insane thing to latch onto all of a sudden sure it’s broken but it is literally unconstitutional to do anything about it. Not even a normal 2/3 amendment approval would get it done which already is an impossible bar. explicitly every single state would need to approve this. Please focus on achievable goals
This is like Defund the Police. You’re just giving the right ammunition to make you look like a bunch of crazies. I honestly think this is a Russian Psy-Op.
In order to get rid of the Senate, you would need a constitutional amendment that first must past 2/3 vote of House AND Senate. You think the Senate is going to vote to abolish itself?
Even if you get that far, it would have to be approved by 3/4 of the states. In the current political climate, you couldn’t get 3/4 of the states to agree that water is wet. Age limits and term limits have the same problem.
The „easiest“ reform you could do is amend the Apportionment Act of 1911, which set the number of House representatives and how they are allocated. You wouldn’t need a constitutional amendment, but there doesn’t seem like there’s been any serious push for this. Smaller states aren’t going to be keen to see their influence diminished, whether they’re red, blue or purple.
Edit: As others have pointed out, it is actually impossible to get rid of the Senate unless all 50 states agree.
No, we really should not.
The senate and the filibuster are the only reason why the SAVE Act is not federal law.
This is so fucking stupid, anyone that supports getting rid of the senate should be laughed out of the room like the fucking idiot they are.
Agreed, their endless embrace of the filibuster is all the evidence we need that they don’t need to exist. Combine it with a new law stating no Congressperson can represent more than 500k and expand the house appropriately
If there were no Senate the Save Act would be going to Trump’s desk for signing right now.
How well do you all think statements like this do outside of the reddit bubble? Think with an ounce of strategy for once.
Y’all are fuckin nuts if you really think this is a good idea
I feel this way too. 18 percent of the country elects 52 Senators so Pieces of excrement like Mitch McConnell can block all progressive positive legislation, while representing 18 percent of the voting population. Soon 15 states will have 70 percent of the US population. So 30 senators for 70 percent of the population while 70 senators for 30 percent of the population in the US Senate. Meaning states like Wyoming, Alaska, and Kentucky can ruin even more lives with their 2 senators each for a population of under 3 million people.
Jacobin, seriously? Anyway because of the Suffrage Clause the Senate cannot be abolished by constitutional amendment. It would require agreement and ratification by 100% of the states.
“No State, without its consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.”
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-5/unamendable-subjects
Can we focus on things that are even remotely reasonable as a possibility?
The problem is that requires a constitutional convention and I absolutely do not trust the people in power currently to be allowed to do anything with that.
lol what? Oh, it’s just the jacobin. But so much for DSA backing off from their crazy ideas
[deleted]
You better come up with a solid new system before you go tearing stuff down. I’d hate for us to make a ‘tear it down to put up a ballroom’ type of mistake.
Well that’s a sure way to cost Democrats votes.
.. and Sabrina Carpenter w/Olivia Rodrigo should parachute into my private compound with a pallet of whipped cream and strawberries too (avoid the fleet of Range Rovers, please).
Unfortunately there’s .. reality (aka the double wide trailer, case of PBRs bought on sale, and that lascivious heavily tatted grandma who’s single for the 14th time).
Term limits, term limits, term limits. Cognitive and physical health screenings every year for all of Congress
Under the Constitution, this can’t even get done with an Amendment. It would take all 50 states to agree. The smaller ones have no incentive to do so. Tough to do without armed revolution.
This is stupid as fuck and borderline authoritarian depending on what you mean when you say get rid of the senate. This shit is also on the DSA’s platform and it doesn’t need to be because it just tarnishes all the actual good stuff on there.
What a stupid statement.
America needs total constitutional reform
Before you downvote, I’m genuinely curious because I don’t follow into things too deeply, this is not an attack on the idea.
What would this achieve in the long run? The two legislative chambers were designed to work together to get things done. Yeah it’s a broken system right now, but what would only having the House do?
There is something big that I’m missing here, but I can’t figure it out- please someone walk me through the process.
These headlines are so stupid. How? How do you abolish the Senate? The only way that happens is with a Constitutional ammendment and the ONLY way that is gonna happen is if 3/4 of the state legislatures ratify it, because that’s never gonna happen in Congress you are never going to get 2/3rds of the Senate to agree to abolish itself. And even if you COULD get an ammendment passed to abolish the Senate, you’d need to also get a unanimous conensus of every State’s legislature and that would never happen.
The entire thought experiment is an exercise is pointless stupidity.
Besides, there’s a better solution to both the gridlock in the Senate and the disappropriate representation of large states that can both legally be done. Uncap the House of Representatives (seriously the reasoning for it being capped is hilariously stupid and shortsighted) and then add Puerto Rico and Washington DC as states. Both of those solutions are actually possible to do and would solve a LOT of our representation problems.