I appreciate that SpaceX continues to find new milestones to stretch for while still sorting out how to safely take Starship orbital.
Here’s hoping flight 13 is the last suborbital flight!
wweiss53 on
Kessler Syndrome is in the offing
RocketVerse on
Seems like a waste of resources, but maybe they’re pumping them out so quickly
Mr_Deep_Research on
There are over 10,800 Starline satellites in orbit right now.
Their lifespan in orbit is about 5 years (5 to 5.3 is the median).
If we just take a rough average, then over the next 5 years, over 2100 of the existing satellites will de-orbit per year.
That is roughly 5.7 per day
This post says a launch will put 20 satellites in orbit.
That adds to the number of satellites that will de-oribt in around 5 years.
And it is less than 4 days of de-orbiting of the 10,800 at this point.
They need to keep launching all these partly because they can’t find other customers who want to put that much stuff in the orbits they are putting these because of the short lifespan in orbit.
mattimoss on
Waste of rare earth metals to be honest. It’s only going to get worse when more private companies start their own constellations. But I guess it’s much easier to sell “futuristic” space based telecommunications then proper wireless terrestrial solutions.
Decronym on
Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I’ve seen in this thread:
Spacex vio que el transporte de punto a punto no era una oropuesta suficientemente tonta y entonces van a lanzar satélites suborbitales.
truecakesnake on
All mainstream subs eventually turn to shit. What are even these comments.
cscottnet on
The operation starlink v3s are being deployed to the same orbit starship is in, that is, *suborbital*. So they will only be very briefly „operational“ before re-entering with starship.
Prior-Flamingo-1378 on
If starship doesn’t go into orbit the sats don’t either.
homonculus_prime on
Oh good! More space garbage! Can’t wait until this dipshit has 30,000 of the things littering the sky.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
11 Kommentare
I appreciate that SpaceX continues to find new milestones to stretch for while still sorting out how to safely take Starship orbital.
Here’s hoping flight 13 is the last suborbital flight!
Kessler Syndrome is in the offing
Seems like a waste of resources, but maybe they’re pumping them out so quickly
There are over 10,800 Starline satellites in orbit right now.
Their lifespan in orbit is about 5 years (5 to 5.3 is the median).
If we just take a rough average, then over the next 5 years, over 2100 of the existing satellites will de-orbit per year.
That is roughly 5.7 per day
This post says a launch will put 20 satellites in orbit.
That adds to the number of satellites that will de-oribt in around 5 years.
And it is less than 4 days of de-orbiting of the 10,800 at this point.
They need to keep launching all these partly because they can’t find other customers who want to put that much stuff in the orbits they are putting these because of the short lifespan in orbit.
Waste of rare earth metals to be honest. It’s only going to get worse when more private companies start their own constellations. But I guess it’s much easier to sell “futuristic” space based telecommunications then proper wireless terrestrial solutions.
Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I’ve seen in this thread:
|Fewer Letters|More Letters|
|——-|———|—|
|[FCC](/r/Space/comments/1uuwpyc/stub/ox71sji „Last usage“)|Federal Communications Commission|
| |(Iron/steel) [Face-Centered Cubic](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allotropes_of_iron) crystalline structure|
|[LEO](/r/Space/comments/1uuwpyc/stub/ox71sji „Last usage“)|Low Earth Orbit (180-2000km)|
| |Law Enforcement Officer (most often mentioned during transport operations)|
|Jargon|Definition|
|——-|———|—|
|[Raptor](/r/Space/comments/1uuwpyc/stub/ox6q9zg „Last usage“)|[Methane-fueled rocket engine](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raptor_(rocket_engine_family)) under development by SpaceX|
|[Starlink](/r/Space/comments/1uuwpyc/stub/ox71sji „Last usage“)|SpaceX’s world-wide satellite broadband constellation|
Decronym is now also available on Lemmy! Requests for support and new installations should be directed to the Contact address below.
—————-
^([Thread #12571 for this sub, first seen 13th Jul 2026, 01:58])
^[[FAQ]](http://decronym.xyz/) [^([Full list])](http://decronym.xyz/acronyms/Space) [^[Contact]](https://hachyderm.io/@Two9A) [^([Source code])](https://gistdotgithubdotcom/Two9A/1d976f9b7441694162c8)
Spacex vio que el transporte de punto a punto no era una oropuesta suficientemente tonta y entonces van a lanzar satélites suborbitales.
All mainstream subs eventually turn to shit. What are even these comments.
The operation starlink v3s are being deployed to the same orbit starship is in, that is, *suborbital*. So they will only be very briefly „operational“ before re-entering with starship.
If starship doesn’t go into orbit the sats don’t either.
Oh good! More space garbage! Can’t wait until this dipshit has 30,000 of the things littering the sky.