Share.

    11 Kommentare

    1. StartledPelican on

      I appreciate that SpaceX continues to find new milestones to stretch for while still sorting out how to safely take Starship orbital.

      Here’s hoping flight 13 is the last suborbital flight!

    2. RocketVerse on

      Seems like a waste of resources, but maybe they’re pumping them out so quickly

    3. Mr_Deep_Research on

      There are over 10,800 Starline satellites in orbit right now.

      Their lifespan in orbit is about 5 years (5 to 5.3 is the median).

      If we just take a rough average, then over the next 5 years, over 2100 of the existing satellites will de-orbit per year.

      That is roughly 5.7 per day

      This post says a launch will put 20 satellites in orbit.

      That adds to the number of satellites that will de-oribt in around 5 years.

      And it is less than 4 days of de-orbiting of the 10,800 at this point.

      They need to keep launching all these partly because they can’t find other customers who want to put that much stuff in the orbits they are putting these because of the short lifespan in orbit.

    4. Waste of rare earth metals to be honest. It’s only going to get worse when more private companies start their own constellations. But I guess it’s much easier to sell “futuristic” space based telecommunications then proper wireless terrestrial solutions.

    5. Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I’ve seen in this thread:

      |Fewer Letters|More Letters|
      |——-|———|—|
      |[FCC](/r/Space/comments/1uuwpyc/stub/ox71sji „Last usage“)|Federal Communications Commission|
      | |(Iron/steel) [Face-Centered Cubic](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allotropes_of_iron) crystalline structure|
      |[LEO](/r/Space/comments/1uuwpyc/stub/ox71sji „Last usage“)|Low Earth Orbit (180-2000km)|
      | |Law Enforcement Officer (most often mentioned during transport operations)|

      |Jargon|Definition|
      |——-|———|—|
      |[Raptor](/r/Space/comments/1uuwpyc/stub/ox6q9zg „Last usage“)|[Methane-fueled rocket engine](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raptor_(rocket_engine_family)) under development by SpaceX|
      |[Starlink](/r/Space/comments/1uuwpyc/stub/ox71sji „Last usage“)|SpaceX’s world-wide satellite broadband constellation|

      Decronym is now also available on Lemmy! Requests for support and new installations should be directed to the Contact address below.

      —————-
      ^([Thread #12571 for this sub, first seen 13th Jul 2026, 01:58])
      ^[[FAQ]](http://decronym.xyz/) [^([Full list])](http://decronym.xyz/acronyms/Space) [^[Contact]](https://hachyderm.io/@Two9A) [^([Source code])](https://gistdotgithubdotcom/Two9A/1d976f9b7441694162c8)

    6. BubblyMoose3597 on

      Spacex vio que el transporte de punto a punto no era una oropuesta suficientemente tonta y entonces van a lanzar satélites suborbitales.

    7. truecakesnake on

      All mainstream subs eventually turn to shit. What are even these comments.

    8. The operation starlink v3s are being deployed to the same orbit starship is in, that is, *suborbital*. So they will only be very briefly „operational“ before re-entering with starship.

    9. homonculus_prime on

      Oh good! More space garbage! Can’t wait until this dipshit has 30,000 of the things littering the sky.

    Leave A Reply