Share.

    27 Kommentare

    1. Late_Faithlessness24 on

      The should be devided in Biogeographical regions only. It’s only way you can be right for a long period of time

    2. democracy_lover66 on

      Yeah like pretty much every single other kind of map like this, it’s stupid and way too over generalized.

    3. HereButNeverPresent on

      MENA just casually including Djibouti is funny

      At the very least should have Sudan and Somalia just to link the Arab World together.

    4. gratiaetfides on

      Finally, someone who classifies European countries just by a Western/Eastern criterion and does not rely on that artificially created category of “Southern Europe” which associates Portugal with Turkey or Cyprus as if they did have anything in common…

    5. I prefer having our Mexican friends in North America.  The Caribbean folks too.  

    6. ZookeepergameFit967 on

      Iran originally was with the Indian subcontinent but they objected to be labelled with them

    7. TheWannabeer on

      I would divide Green in eastern Asia and Oceania
      But sure, why TF not.

      Let’s put more than 2 billion people with completely different cultures, languages, religions, comercial interactions, geographical characteristics , historis and spheres of influence in the same general „I have no Idea what is going on here“ part of the pacifi

    8. Ah yes, the famous Central Europe + Central Asia region. Since both are central they have a lot in common, right?

    9. wildingflow on

      French Guyana being in Western Europe is funny

      Like, technically it is, but practically it’s a vestige of French colonialism in the Amazon rainforest lol

    10. delta1982ro on

      yes cause eastern european countries have more in common with kazakhstan and suberia than they do with austria, germany or italy.. definetley

    11. human_alias on

      Funny to me one of the major delineations is just oh there’s more slavs out here

    Leave A Reply