Share.

27 Kommentare

  1. Late_Faithlessness24 on

    The should be devided in Biogeographical regions only. It’s only way you can be right for a long period of time

  2. democracy_lover66 on

    Yeah like pretty much every single other kind of map like this, it’s stupid and way too over generalized.

  3. HereButNeverPresent on

    MENA just casually including Djibouti is funny

    At the very least should have Sudan and Somalia just to link the Arab World together.

  4. gratiaetfides on

    Finally, someone who classifies European countries just by a Western/Eastern criterion and does not rely on that artificially created category of “Southern Europe” which associates Portugal with Turkey or Cyprus as if they did have anything in common…

  5. I prefer having our Mexican friends in North America.  The Caribbean folks too.  

  6. ZookeepergameFit967 on

    Iran originally was with the Indian subcontinent but they objected to be labelled with them

  7. TheWannabeer on

    I would divide Green in eastern Asia and Oceania
    But sure, why TF not.

    Let’s put more than 2 billion people with completely different cultures, languages, religions, comercial interactions, geographical characteristics , historis and spheres of influence in the same general „I have no Idea what is going on here“ part of the pacifi

  8. Ah yes, the famous Central Europe + Central Asia region. Since both are central they have a lot in common, right?

  9. wildingflow on

    French Guyana being in Western Europe is funny

    Like, technically it is, but practically it’s a vestige of French colonialism in the Amazon rainforest lol

  10. delta1982ro on

    yes cause eastern european countries have more in common with kazakhstan and suberia than they do with austria, germany or italy.. definetley

  11. human_alias on

    Funny to me one of the major delineations is just oh there’s more slavs out here

Leave A Reply