Großbritannien sagt, dass es dem Iran niemals gestattet werden dürfe, Atomwaffen zu entwickeln

https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/uk-says-iran-must-never-be-allowed-develop-nuclear-weapons-2026-02-28/

27 Kommentare

  1. SanguinaryGuardsman on

    The UK and US are reaping what they sowed in 1953 because they could not stand for a Democratic Iran with nationalized Oil industry.

  2. What will this failure of a government actually do about it tho?

    I say that too What’s next? Politics is really for people who like to hear their own voice

  3. Nothing about the fact that they were actively involved in talks on the nuclear issue when Israel and the USA launched unprovoked attacks?

    Whats the one things likely to prevent that kind of attack…yep, having nuclear weapons.

    If you don’t want countries to have nukes, maybe stop giving them reason to want them.

  4. firmagorilla on

    What if we made a deal with them about their nuclear ambitions? In turn, we would be more open in the trade? Novel idea? Nobel prize for me?

  5. Visible_Goose_4116 on

    I’m not a fan of the religious regime in Iran but what other than nuclear weapons guarantees sovereignty? Ukraine gave theirs up and the guarantees were worthless. The US isn’t an ally of anyone anymore. So why would anyone trust anything at this point. 

  6. Great, thanks Starmer. Keep supporting unpopular American wars. This’ll definitely help your popularity.

  7. Missing the mark a bit. Population centers were attacked by countries who have nuclear weapons. Maybe condemn violence first?

  8. MeringueExpensive901 on

    Why isn’t the UK investigating Israel’s nuclear program? No one doesn’t know what is there.

  9. Hilariously iran is part of a very long list of nations that have never nuked another country. The US on the other hand is on a very short list that has. They’re also on an equally small list of countries who did it more than once😂

    US really should be the only country banned from having them😂

  10. There’s a country with an illegal nuclear programme in the Middle East, whos nuclear stance (aside from refusing any independent oversight and regulatory checks) is to nuke its allies if they’re threatened.

    I can’t quite remeber who it is- apart from it isn’t Iran. Can anyone help? Think it rhymes with Tisreal?

  11. On the basis of the shit they did and what they did to the citizen, neither should the US, Russia, Israel and China.

    But those very nukes gives them a free pass to start wars away without getting invaded themselves.

    The last decades were a big advertisement campaign to indeed get nukes.

  12. iamaspacepizza on

    a free Iran absolutely needs nuclear weapons, considering multiple of its neighbours have been invaded by a coalition of nuclear powers.

  13. If you want to make the claim that countries like Iran can maintain sovereignty whilst also not pursuing nukes, then the UK and US need to stand by their security garuntees with the countries that willingly gave up their nukes.

    You can’t have your cake and eat it too, you need to make nuclear disarment a viable strategy, otherwise you’re just making veiled threats that if they dont sabotage themselves you’ll destroy them.

  14. I think we can all agree on this. Iranian regime/China/Russia may not like it but oh well.

  15. They’ve been saying Iran was days / weeks / months away from nuclear weapons for 30 years. It doesn’t seem that this is the real reason.

Leave A Reply