Share.

    39 Kommentare

    1. Man, legislators have been trying to stop kids from looking at porn since playboy in the 70s. Then it was internet blockers at the home or in highschool. Porn finds a way. It’s a waste of time, kids will find a way.

    2. Honestly, fuck implementing any of this bullshit. It has nothing to do with protecting kids and everything to do with government control.

    3. Why we listening to ANY moralizing from conservatives? They’ve been grossly exposed. Just say fuck off and move on. You don’t get to have a pedo nazi president then pretend to care about morals.

    4. Why don’t they go after the human traffickers, instead? Oh, wait. Who are the human traffickers?

    5. ActivityIcy4926 on

      If an OS is verified for an adult and a kid uses it, doesn’t that completely defeat the point?

    6. Cloud_Matrix on

      How about parents do their fucking job rather than trying to get Colorado to morph into some kind of digital nanny state?

      If you can’t be bothered to moderate your child’s internet usage, maybe you should go live in a Amish community, or maybe you aren’t fit to be a parent.

    7. SgathTriallair on

      This has absolutely nothing to do with porn. They want to force every person to install government issued spyware on your computer. The Feds won’t even have to go looking for anti-party speech, your computer will just narc on you for saying mean things about Trump.

      The fact that any living human is supporting this is insane.

    8. RedShiftedTime on

      Christians spend more time thinking about other people’s genitals more than anyone else in the entire world.

    9. Angelic_Doom on

      „Age Verification“ is their new way of saying we want to ID all your traffic.

    10. >The bill calls for the device owner to register their birthdate or age, but for the purposes of creating an “age bracket,” which can then be shared to an app developer through an API to learn their age range, according to BiometricUpdate.com.

      >The bill comes from state Sen. Matt Ball and Rep. Amy Paschal, both Democrats. Ball seems to view his measure as pro-privacy and as a way to stop kids from downloading adult-oriented apps. “No personal information is communicated that you could use to identify somebody; it’s just an age bracket signal,”

      Pointless exercise.

    11. hornetjockey on

      Kiss my balls, Colorado. They’re just going to turn people like me into criminals because there is no fucking way I’m doing that.

    12. oldirishfart on

      Putting aside the “why”… it is better to store an age-verification proof locally encrypted with an OS api that just informs a website that the age check is ok or not, rather than uploading photo ID to many websites and apps for them to be hacked and stolen à la Discord.

      Of course the “why” is all about tying individuals to their online activity for restricting freedoms and tightening control over the citizenry.

    13. onthe3rdlifealready on

      Wtf Colorado… I guess no state is a bastion of hope anymore. Welp guess I’ll kms

    14. This is all about monetization and control. Control the access to the information and services you approve to sell to them.

      We’re way past the point where “what about the children?” has weight, with the constant and ongoing high profile child-related scandals, usually by the very politicians that push these types of agendas.

    15. QuitCallingNewsrooms on

      Let me guess, I’ll need to buy a license for each OS version based on the ages of people in my house?

      And by „buy,“ I mean „subscribe“

    16. Old-Information3311 on

      Soon you will have to give your id to every website that allows you to post, message, comment, or upload content. The data of what every one is doing online will be given to companies like palantir who will use it for mass surveilance, cambridge analytica style political manipulation, and creating lists of the people they find to be subversive.

      Palantir is already helping ice create lists of potential immigrants to be targeted.

    17. There is 0% chance this would ever get implemented in Linux. Microsoft on the other hand, I can totally see them going along with this. Not that the implementation would make any sense. The stated purpose of it isn’t the actual reason though ofc

    18. We can’t even do security at the operating system level.

      I know. Implants. We give everyone an implant with their Human Number…

    19. this is very big brother. in order to do this you’re giving up personal data like an ID or face scan. Discord is trying this and it’s not good

    Leave A Reply