Die Abstimmung über den Clarity Act wurde heute gestrichen, nachdem der CEO von Coinbase grundsätzlich zugegeben hatte, dass sie ihn nicht unterstützen würden, weil er Stablecoin-Renditen verbietet (Auf Wiedersehen, Konkurrenz für Banken).
Es sieht so aus, als hätten die großen Banken endlich Angst davor, ihr Monopol zu verlieren, und zogen alle Hebel in Bewegung, um die Kryptowährungen an der Leine zu halten.
https://dailycryptobriefs.com/news/us-senate-clarity-act-vote-canceled-hr-3633/
15 Kommentare
↕️
tldr; The U.S. Senate Banking Committee postponed its scheduled January 15, 2026, markup vote on the CLARITY Act (H.R. 3633), a bill aimed at establishing a regulatory framework for the crypto market. The markup session, which involves debating amendments and deciding whether to advance the bill, was delayed without a specified reason or a new date. The CLARITY Act seeks to define token classifications, regulatory responsibilities, and compliance pathways, while addressing stablecoin regulations and decentralized finance oversight.
*This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.
The trump administration will need to whip the republicans in line to include stable coin yields. It’s central to trumps economic plan.
Postponed, not cancelled
Whelp, that’s all folks. See yall in 2027
Coinbase’s pullout game is strong.
More laws always end up causing more problems than they solve, so this is probably a good thing. The big banks would pretty much be writing these bills anyway
Banks have balance sheet requirements and can offer yields. Stable coins are trying to provide yields with no balance sheet requirements. Either stable coins are going to be regulated like a bank or they won’t offer yield. I don’t see the entire US banking system going under so USDC can offer yield.
Sooner or later people will realize that crypto is money. It’s just the value that people believe it is worth. Just like the dollar bill except you can carry the dollars in your pockets with no need or worrying if the WiFi works so you can make a crypto exchange.
How does Coinbase have this kind of influence on the Senate?
The answer is pulsechain and Pdai.
man why are we mixed up with this stable coin yield nonsense.
most these stable coin runners are proposing to provide yield by investing in treasuries, bonds etc or by running rehypothecation lending schemes. fuck all that. none of it is really related to crypto. unless maybe someone talking about holding bitcoin (or your favorite alt) and provide yield via its appreciation (the saylor playbook essentially).
stable coins are just for the new age tech bros to disrupt banks with their own private databases essentially. don’t care about trading one master for the other. but sadly the narrative already baked in that stable coin good = bitcoin (crypto) good!
I wonder if robinhood agrees?
I’m glad Coinbase publicly announced they won’t back it. People should be able to earn from their Stablecoins. It’s their investment.
time for sideways chop time for accumulation 🤤