Share.

14 Kommentare

  1. Brennenstein on

    **TL;DR:**

    The United States is seizing a sanctioned oil tanker in international waters off Venezuela, led by the U.S. Coast Guard as part of a wider regional military buildup. This is the second such tanker seizure in recent weeks and follows President Donald Trump’s order for a “total and complete blockade” of sanctioned oil tankers entering or leaving Venezuela. The moves have effectively created an embargo, sharply reducing Venezuelan crude exports as many loaded tankers now remain in local waters to avoid confiscation. Analysts say that if this continues, the loss of up to nearly a million barrels per day of crude could eventually push global oil prices higher, even though the market is currently well supplied. Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro accuses Washington of using military pressure and strikes near Venezuela as part of a campaign to overthrow him and seize control of the country’s vast oil reserves.

  2. cbs-anonmouse on

    Maritime law is wild, but pretty much any country has the legal “right” to board a vessel in international waters if the vessel is not flying a flag or is operating under a fictitious registration.

    The USCG has law endorcement authority and these seizures appear to be pursuant to US court orders. We were doing this before the current administration as well. So there’s nothing particularly notable here.

    It would be bigly different if these vessels were legally registered. But basically if your boat is not properly flagged then you have no country to back you up on international waters.

  3. UltimateKane99 on

    A sanctioned oil tanker… So a tanker that may be seized by anyone? And the US is just doing it because they’re in the correct location with documentation confirming it’s stateless?

    Either people in general or the news in specific seems to forget that the seizing of sanctioned oil tankers (or any sanctioned vessel) is legal by ANY country that finds them, such as is defined in the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, which grants exclusive jurisdiction to the „flag state“ for seizures. In these cases, the US usually asks the „flag state“ (under which the boat is flying its flag) if they are aware of the boat and can ascertain its contents/destinations. If the country cannot prove it (or is caught with its hand in the cookie jar, so to speak, and thus denies any relation), then *any* country can seize the boat, as it’s considered a „stateless vessel“ and can be seized.

    Most countries don’t bother because it affects the complex web of geopolitical relations that exist and can result in unexpected backlashes and/or create unnecessary enemies. That said, if there’s one thing the cheetoh-in-chief does in spades, it’s make unnecessary enemies.

  4. Asleep-Arachnid6386 on

    It’s truly insane that nobody is protesting, nobody seems to be alarmed that the US is starting a war with no legitimate reason. If you think about it, this is worse than Russia as you could claim that Russia had some „reasoning“ ( they don’t ) but the US well and truly has no reason 

  5. EgotisticalTL on

    Must be something with oil, or Hegseth and Trump would have just murdered them.

  6. Hm, well there are other ways to transport crude oil. But it seems the US is on their oil game again.

    Like always they stick their nose in the business of countries that have oil with one or another excuse.

  7. Thunderclone_1 on

    At least it’s a mild improvement over summary execution

    Still piracy, though.

  8. So, both murder and privacy.

    Keep in up, America – really classy.

    /s/s/s/s/s/s/s/s/s

  9. This ship was carrying Naptha from Russia and was flying the flag of Gambia. The nation of Gambia said it is not registered there and had a fraudulent certificate.

  10. Ship gets sanctioned for violating sanctions, ship flies false flag, ship gets siezed…

Leave A Reply