Close Menu
    Welt

    Ohne Sicherheitsgarantien sei jedes Abkommen zwischen Russland und der Ukraine zum Scheitern verurteilt, sagt Starmer

    Share.
    View 14 Comments

    14 Kommentare

    1. supercyberlurker on

      .. and they can’t be from the US, because those are utterly worthless now.

    4. anders_hansson on

      Good to hear that shift in policy, seeing as Johnson explicitly said that we wouldn’t agree to any security guarantees.

      Next step: From words to action.

    5. Scar3cr0w_ on

      And it’s doomed with them.

      One side won’t accept their inclusion, the other won’t accept their exclusion. But we cannot give in to Russia.

      Not

      One

      Inch

    6. babarjango on

      Starmer: No deal without guarantees.

      Translation: „We’ll send thoughts/prayers + 2B POUNDS in aid til 2030.“

    7. whatitbeitis on

      Europe has a great opportunity to unite and provide that security guarantee. Between France, Poland, and the UK they have enough military strength to do just that. 

      The rest of Europe can provide financial support while building their militaries to contribute in the future. 

      No need at all to rely on the United States for anything to support Ukraine. 

    8. NoAccident6637 on

      The last deal had security guarantees… that didn’t work out to great for Ukraine. Give Ukraine its nuclear weapons back. That is the closest they will get to security. Can’t rely on America.

    10. spastical-mackerel on

      Guarantees backed up by meaningful forces deployed to Ukraine and the Baltics. Next time Russia wants to mess around they should have to confront actual NATO forces in the first hour.

    11. Ancient_Ship2980 on

      NATO/Article 5-style guarantees would not suffice without „boots on the ground.“ The Trump Administration is obviously not going to station troops in Ukraine as a back-stop for a peace agreement. The European so-called „Coalition of the Willing“ could do so, but that would require a lot of negotiations and hand-holding among the signatories of any such European agreement to station military forces in Ukraine. Moreover, any such European force in Ukraine would require logistical and intelligence support from the U.S.

      It pains me to say this, but I cannot see Trump or the Trump Administration doing that. Finally, how does it make sense to be discussing these things when it does not seem likely that Putin and Russia are ever going to accept any peace agreement or even cease fire that is remotely acceptable to Ukraine or it’s European allies? Ukraine and Europe are going to have to figure out some way of changing this equation to make Russian military operations in Ukraine unsustainable and force Putin to reassess his adamant resistance to genuine peace or cease fire negotiations. That is a very tall order and would require a large increase in the already considerable European military aid to Ukraine.

    12. Amazing-Loss-7762 on

      No one will give security guarantees and even if they do no one is going to nuke war over ukraine. This us why this war hasn’t ended yet. Any security guarantees are not worth the paper there written on…Ukraine has guarantees after giving up the nukes…much good that did…

    Leave A Reply