Share.

    9 Kommentare

    1. LaserBeamHorse on

      I do agree that it should be easier than it is now, but I really dislike that vague wording. There will be many court cases regarding „proper reason“.

    2. Previously you could still fire staff for „[proper and weighty](https://tyosuojelu.fi/en/employment-relationship/termination)“ reasons, now you just need „proper“ reason. I’m no lawyer, so I have no idea what this change in wording legally entails, but under this proposal both neglecting obligations or inability to to work seem the count as proper reasons for dismissal.

      Also good, protections for lesser-abled individuals will continue to exist:

      >[…] In future, the employer’s obligation to reassign the employee would apply only in cases where the employee’s capacity to work has changed during the employment relationship. This would apply, for example, if the employee’s ability to work had deteriorated due to illness, injury or occupational accident.

      All in all, the changes seems pretty mild.

    3. beowulf_the_hero on

      Sure but shorten the trial period to 3 months like other reasonable countries have

      Edit: 6 months is pretty ridiculous, yet again I am comparing to Denmark where it was 3 but it seems they got their shit figured out better than Finland

    4. There’s still this mentality that companies have some obligation to keep people employed, every job should be permanent etc. Which is complete nonsense obviously. 

    5. ExternalTree1949 on

      This is a good thing if it succeeds in solving the problem of habitual „saikuttajat“.

      My wife used to work as a practical nurse. They had a lot of those according to her.

    6. That certainly is one way of solving the unemployment crisis. Make it *easier* to create more.

    7. ViruliferousBadger on

      Making it easier to make you unemployed will surely fix that 11,4% unemployment rate…

      Also making the actual law as vague as possible and needing the court system, in three different stages which each will cost the loser at least 20K eur, to decide what the law *actually* means is just so…. Finnished.

    Leave A Reply