I do agree that it should be easier than it is now, but I really dislike that vague wording. There will be many court cases regarding „proper reason“.
backnarkle48 on
Yeah that’ll help the unemployment problem go away
Apoc2K on
Previously you could still fire staff for „[proper and weighty](https://tyosuojelu.fi/en/employment-relationship/termination)“ reasons, now you just need „proper“ reason. I’m no lawyer, so I have no idea what this change in wording legally entails, but under this proposal both neglecting obligations or inability to to work seem the count as proper reasons for dismissal.
Also good, protections for lesser-abled individuals will continue to exist:
>[…] In future, the employer’s obligation to reassign the employee would apply only in cases where the employee’s capacity to work has changed during the employment relationship. This would apply, for example, if the employee’s ability to work had deteriorated due to illness, injury or occupational accident.
All in all, the changes seems pretty mild.
beowulf_the_hero on
Sure but shorten the trial period to 3 months like other reasonable countries have
Edit: 6 months is pretty ridiculous, yet again I am comparing to Denmark where it was 3 but it seems they got their shit figured out better than Finland
yksvaan on
There’s still this mentality that companies have some obligation to keep people employed, every job should be permanent etc. Which is complete nonsense obviously.
ExternalTree1949 on
This is a good thing if it succeeds in solving the problem of habitual „saikuttajat“.
My wife used to work as a practical nurse. They had a lot of those according to her.
nicol9 on
everyday closer to copying the fucked up society in the USA…
herrawho on
That certainly is one way of solving the unemployment crisis. Make it *easier* to create more.
ViruliferousBadger on
Making it easier to make you unemployed will surely fix that 11,4% unemployment rate…
Also making the actual law as vague as possible and needing the court system, in three different stages which each will cost the loser at least 20K eur, to decide what the law *actually* means is just so…. Finnished.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
9 Kommentare
I do agree that it should be easier than it is now, but I really dislike that vague wording. There will be many court cases regarding „proper reason“.
Yeah that’ll help the unemployment problem go away
Previously you could still fire staff for „[proper and weighty](https://tyosuojelu.fi/en/employment-relationship/termination)“ reasons, now you just need „proper“ reason. I’m no lawyer, so I have no idea what this change in wording legally entails, but under this proposal both neglecting obligations or inability to to work seem the count as proper reasons for dismissal.
Also good, protections for lesser-abled individuals will continue to exist:
>[…] In future, the employer’s obligation to reassign the employee would apply only in cases where the employee’s capacity to work has changed during the employment relationship. This would apply, for example, if the employee’s ability to work had deteriorated due to illness, injury or occupational accident.
All in all, the changes seems pretty mild.
Sure but shorten the trial period to 3 months like other reasonable countries have
Edit: 6 months is pretty ridiculous, yet again I am comparing to Denmark where it was 3 but it seems they got their shit figured out better than Finland
There’s still this mentality that companies have some obligation to keep people employed, every job should be permanent etc. Which is complete nonsense obviously.
This is a good thing if it succeeds in solving the problem of habitual „saikuttajat“.
My wife used to work as a practical nurse. They had a lot of those according to her.
everyday closer to copying the fucked up society in the USA…
That certainly is one way of solving the unemployment crisis. Make it *easier* to create more.
Making it easier to make you unemployed will surely fix that 11,4% unemployment rate…
Also making the actual law as vague as possible and needing the court system, in three different stages which each will cost the loser at least 20K eur, to decide what the law *actually* means is just so…. Finnished.