Share.

    32 Kommentare

    1. By Gabe Whisnant — Breaking News Editor |

      The Supreme Court on Tuesday agreed to fast-track a case testing President Donald Trump’s authority to impose sweeping tariffs under federal law. The justices scheduled arguments for November, an unusually quick timetable by the court’s standards.

      Small businesses and states challenging the tariffs say Trump illegally invoked emergency powers to levy import taxes on goods from nearly every country, pushing them to the brink of collapse. Lower courts have largely sided with the challengers but left most of the tariffs in place while the case proceeds.

      Read more: [https://www.newsweek.com/supreme-court-donald-trump-tariffs-update-ruling-case-2127269](https://www.newsweek.com/supreme-court-donald-trump-tariffs-update-ruling-case-2127269)

    2. Just_the_nicest_guy on

      After spending 2024 slow-walking every decision related to his criminal cases to run out the clock before the election.

    3. backpackwayne on

      It goes really fast when they know the answer ahead of time.

      Not a single person in the world believes they will not rule in Donnie’s favor. They are his bitch now.

    4. please strike down the stupid tariffs.

      I’m getting tired of Trump using it to bully our allies while turning a blind eye on our enemies like China and Russia.

    5. What they actually mean is that they will rubber stamp his dictatorship at record speed.

    6. We all know how it will go… SCOTUS will give Turd another win in his consolidation of power.

      Congress has the constitutional authority to set tariffs, but it has delegated some of this power to the President through legislation like Section 232 and Section 301 of trade acts. These laws allow the President to impose tariffs under specific conditions, such as those related to national security or to address unfair trade practices, but the delegation of power is limited and subject to constitutional checks. 

    7. StinkiePhish on

      It’s confusing, but the profiteering outcome is that they strike the tariffs down and allow investment companies that have bought refund rights to make boatloads of money. Oh and prices won’t come down, so more profit for large importers. 

    8. thistimelineisweird on

      Lining up to suck his mushroom dick, again. The one that raped children.

    9. > record speed

      No surprise there nor will be the result in favor of trump… What about the hypocrisy of no race in admissions processes for universities and yet we have the recent ruling about ICE raids?

    10. We are so far past the idea of „calling balls and strikes“ with SCOTUS. I mean, we are really deep into, „SCOTUS is the official judicial branch of the Republican party“ type of ratfuckery. These are literally unelected political actors that wield a majority power capable of rivaling both the Congress and President of the United States.

      I would sooner vote to abolish SCOTUS than reform it. Also, just a reminder that SCOTUS is the reason our politics are so fucked up, it is a snake eating its own tail, see Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010).

    11. YesterShill on

      Regardless of the actual law, I think Vegas would give 10:1 odds for the Supreme Court to bend the knee to Trump.

    12. ranchoparksteve on

      At this point I hope Trump wins and tariffs wipe out the entire Republican Party. I will not shed a tear.

    13. 9_to_5_till_i_die on

      I genuinely don’t grasp how fucking spineless and pathetic you have to be to grovel for anyone, nevermind Donald fucking Trump.

    14. No point in hearing it. They are just going to side with trump like everything else.

    15. DaBigJMoney on

      Does anyone seriously doubt how they’re going to rule?

      These spineless cretins will never rule against Trump for anything he truly wants. They’re not an independent judiciary.

      The “Predictable 6” are a rubber stamp for the dictator-in-chief. Our balance of powers is broken (maybe beyond repair).

    16. SnooMacarons1185 on

      Teaching constitutional law at law schools must be quite a challenge these days.

    17. Objective_Bar_5420 on

      This is interesting. They are his dogs, to be sure. But they have to choose between doing what he orders and saving him from himself. If the tariffs stay in place, the economy will be back in full recession by the midterms. They could choose to save him from himself.

    18. Biden should have really packed the court. Dems lost it all last year anyway without him doing it.

    19. ThePhonyOrchestra on

      Biden can’t forgive $10,000 of student loan dept with sound legal reasoning, but Trump can unilaterally raise taxes without Congress.

      I’m happy to be wrong, but I doubt the Supreme Court will do the right thing.

    20. Plenty-Huckleberry94 on

      Get ready for another blatantly unconstitutional decision from the partisan arbiters of constitutional law!!

    21. PerniciousPeyton on

      Mark my words: this one is getting overturned. I’m an attorney and while it makes little sense to overturn the decision, it will be.

      The dissent in the appeals court decision gives all the justification SCOTUS needs to say the IEEPA gives Trump carte blanche to impose whatever tariff he wants at whatever percentage he wants against any nation he wants on any dubious “emergency” basis he announces.

      It’s sad to see the checks and balances I studied so hard once upon a time be swept aside in the name of power and ideology. It’s sad to see the Court twist itself into saying that legislative authority prohibits once President from canceling student loans while another president can use the world’s most sprawling, unrestricted interpretation of statute in completely usurping Congress’s constitutional role in enacting tariffs.

      SCOTUS is an embarrassment and I thank whatever god an atheist thanks that I’m privileged enough to be leaving this country within the month. Good luck to everyone who has to continue living through this nightmare in the coming years.

    22. apoca1ypse12 on

      These people really need to be shown the door. They no longer protect the american people. They protect their ideology and only the people that thinks like them.

    23. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, on X: „Now that August is in the books, tariff revenues topped over $31 billion in the month: a new record high“

      Breaking: Trump taxes Americans at record levels with his illegal national sales tax.

    24. luv2ctheworld on

      I will never forget or forgive the Republicans who slow walked Obama’s Supreme Court nominee, because the Senate deemed it inappropriate to allow the hearing to occur. Only for them to speed run Trump’s.

      They are traitors to this country.

      They let politics and personal allegiance become the primary motivation in being in office and destroy the judicial branch of our government.

      If there is a god, they’d be held accountable for their sins. But there isn’t, and that’s why these guys do it and get away with it.

    25. villalulaesi on

      Why bother? Just get a big rubber stamp that says “overturned” and use it on every lower court decision unfavorable to Trump. No need to try and make up a constitution-based reason for the decision, I think we can all drop the pretense at this point.

    Leave A Reply