Share.

    17 Kommentare

    1. > “We all thought M3GAN was like Superman,“ Blum said of his studio Blumhouse’s approach to the M3GAN sequel, which saw stars Allison Williams and Violet McGraw reprise their roles from the original movie as a roboticist and her niece. „We could do anything to her. We could change genres. We could put her in the summer. We could make her look different. We could turn her from a bad guy into a good guy. And we classically over-thought how powerful people’s engagement was, really, with her.“

      > During the podcast, Blum identified the movie’s „genre-swap“ — the first movie functioned as a horror movie with M3GAN as a slasher-type villain while the sequel pitched the bloodthirsty child robot as an action hero — as well as the decision to release the sequel in the summer as reasons behind the film’s box office failure.

      > „We thought she could live in the summer, right? We thought, ‚We’re going from a little movie to a tentpole!‘ „

    2. At least they seem aware of it. M3GAN was a natural icon of the moment, the entire sequel felt forced.

    3. TheHumanTarget84 on

      Finding something that works and running it into the ground is a time honored Hollywood tradition.

    4. Mammoth-Substance3 on

      The fact that they didn’t understand their own character kind of tells you all you need to know about the current state of big budget movie making.

    5. ThatGuyFromTheM0vie on

      Blumhouse thinking they can do anything is so fucking funny. They produce mass volumes of shit, and every once in a while—something sticks. And then they ruin it lol.

    6. panchoamadeus on

      It’s a failure of the marketing department. Barely any promotion it in the gay community

    7. The first one was a cool little thriller. When I watched the trailer I didn’t know wtf I was seeing. They turned what was menacing into a vaudeville, b-movie line spouting, zany cartoon character. Sequel looked ridiculous.

    8. Frazzledghost on

      See what happens when you put all your eggs in the flavor of the week meme basket 🧺

    9. Sea_Equivalent_4207 on

      Probably releasing it during the summer was not a good move with that race car movie and another remake about dragons. But at least give them some credit, they didn’t copy the original formula of the first film and made something different so good for them. Not a blumhouse fan at all because they’ve been mining nostalgia for years now and those Halloween films suck and some of those other horror remakes they’ve been responsible for.

    10. LightningMantis on

      I know I am in the minority here, but I loved M3GAN 2.0! It felt like a cheerleader movie. Like, the first movie was fun in its own way, and now it was time for the filmmakers to cheer Megan on and watch her do so much crazier shit.

      I loved the turn to being a sassy good guy. And I loved the genre switch. And I loved all the crazy stuff they did in the flick.

      I would love to see Megan tackle other genres. Heist movie where she recruits other AI’s to do whatever. Courtroom drama where she has to defend her actions to a jury of her AI peers. Post apocalyptic movie where Cady is long gone and we see her dealing with that. I don’t mind if the sequels bounce all over the place in genre and timeline.

      I don’t even mind if they go back to horror. Even if they do odd movies in the franchise are horror and even numbered are [*picks genre from a hat*]. Would I watch a Megan rom com? Yep!

      I do agree though that moving the movie to a summer release was flying too close to the sun. Lots of major competition and Megan isn’t that big.

      But man, this meat sack freaking loved M3GAN 2.0. Bravo, I say. Bravo!

    11. >“We could do anything to her. We could change genres. We could put her in the summer. We could make her look different. We could turn her from a bad guy into a good guy.“

      WTF? It took Nightmare on Elm Street a pile of movies to sloooowly move Freddie in that direction. They wanted to do it after 1 movie?

    Leave A Reply