Share.

    11 Kommentare

    1. BandZealousideal587 on

      They’ll be out in 3.5, nowhere near enough considering the one not wielding the knife told the knife man explicitly to kill the policeman.

    2. lalabadmans on

      We’ve all been imprisoned and our freedoms restricted longer during Covid lockdown than most violent criminals will ever be.

    3. Intrepid-Patient574 on

      Based on their facial hair, they look like they haven’t got a clue how to use a blade.

    4. Ok_Present_6774 on

      So they tried to kill someone that said they were a police officer and they got 7 years? If that’s not 2 tiers then I don’t know what is.

    5. BigRegBarclay on

      Wow 7 years and out in 3.5 for what should have been attempted murder when they’ve already got previous for knives and violent crime.

      I’m sure this time they’ll learn their lesson though.

    6. pottypotty699 on

      These sort of people are a shame to our community should be locked for life for attack on a police officer.

    7. limeflavoured on

      7 years is on the high end for GBH. Could probably (for once) make a decent argument that it should have been attempted murder, but im not surprised they didn’t.

    8. Negative_Link_277 on

      > Barrister Kevin Molloy, for Humar, said his client’s behaviour could be a reaction to bullying suffered at school.
      >
      > He told the judge: „The violence was in an attempt to get away rather that just attacking someone for the sake of it.“

      How the fuck they can say that with a straight face I do not know.

    9. FabulousPetes on

      Why has no government had the wherewithal to change sentencing guidelines to increase time served for violent offences, and lower those for nonviolent?

      While I think this should have been attempted murder, 7 years for GBH of this nature is atrocious.

    Leave A Reply