Share.

    32 Kommentare

    1. I_Hate_Consulting on

      Now we get to watch Trump pointedly ignore TWO Supreme Court decisions! We better be careful. Three makes a constitutional crisis!

    2. emperorsolo on

      Victory, For now. Time will tell if the Fascists that occupy the executive branch will overtly undermine this ruling.

    3. VladtheInhaler999 on

      Oh boy here it comes. 8647 one day, another court ruling against him the next. I don’t expect a thorough conversation, I’m here for an epic weekend meltdown. Same for pee wee German Stephan Miller and his little dog MTG too.

    4. One side of me said glad SCOTUS got this right, the other part of me says like trump is gonna fucking stop

    5. 1/ We all know which 2 dissented

      2/ If I’m reading this right (and its very possible I’m not), then this is a big hand up to the immigrant group. Basically saying try again in the fifth circuit and if you don’t like that outcome then come to us.

      3/ For anyone who’s getting their hopes *too* high, this isn’t them saying that deporting people using the Alien Enemies Act is unconstitutional (like this article title is hinting).

    6. Ninevehenian on

      There are some interesting points to be seen, SC is highly responsible for enabling the corruption and lawlessness, but them being people and seemingly having some limits to their behaviour makes the institution partially resilient vs. the more practical filth that musk and trumps idiocy constitute.

      There is some value to having systems that rely on people mixed with systems that depend on bureaucracy.

    7. > The court did not rule on whether the Alien Enemies Act, which the Trump administration invoked in mid-April to deport the detainees, had been applied correctly.

      > “To be clear, we decide today only that the detainees are entitled to more notice than was given on April 18,” their ruling said.

      It’s *something*, but the ruling was pretty limited, given they didn’t address the overall use of the Alien Enemies Act.

    8. WeCameAsMuffins on

      Alright Trump! You know what to do now, go on truth social and rant about how the Supreme Court are radical leftists and somehow get on about Biden!

    9. >The court did not rule on whether the Alien Enemies Act, which the Trump administration invoked in mid-April to deport the detainees, had been applied correctly.

      >“To be clear, we decide today only that the detainees are entitled to more notice than was given on April 18,” their ruling said.

    10. doorbell2021 on

      At some point we’re going to have a post from him that ends mid-sentence as he strokes out from the stress of all his failures. There has to be a limit to how pissed off he can get before he pops, right?

    11. Leadbelly82 on

      Y’all will do nothing to stop him. He could be rotting in a cell right now

    12. annaflixion on

      Oh, good, they didn’t even bother to decide whether the Alien Enemies Act was applied correctly. I fucking hate this timeline. Not as much as the detainees have hated theirs re deportation, but I still hate it.

    13. Lostsock1995 on

      Unsurprising about our regular two dissenters 🙄 but still good news! Not sure what parts of this will hold in a government as crazy as ours, but I’ll take any step in the right direction even if it’s small

    14. With how much Trump has defied court orders like this over reaching power….one thinks what would’ve happened a couple years ago when Biden was handed a loss on the student loan thing and just ordered them forgiven anyways. The Republicans would be calling for his head. But here we are with Trump probably going to defy this order and both sides seemingly are just quiet because they’re scared. Spineless fucking cowards. 

    15. Article cites that the court decided that Trump didn’t give them enough time or resources.

      This isn’t „against trump“ it’s moreso the classic „kick the can down the road“

    16. The glaring conclusion from this ruling is Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito need to be arrested immediately, denied due process and habeus corpus, and immediately deported or “dealt with”, seeing as that’s how they think the world should work.

    17. > the court said the Trump administration had not given the detainees enough time or adequate resources to challenge their deportations.

      > “Under these circumstances, notice roughly 24 hours before removal, devoid of information about how to exercise due process rights to contest that removal, surely does not pass muster,” the ruling said.

      That’s not exactly ruling against the whole thing, is it?

    18. gorillafightsurvivor on

      Haven’t opened the article yet, but I’m gonna go ahead and put my chips down on 7-2, Alito and Thomas dissenting.

      Edit after opening the article: like clockwork.

    19. bibliophile224 on

      We’ve got deceased justices now weighing in?

      „“The Court characterizes the District Court’s behavior during the period in question as ‘inaction,’ but in my judgment, that is unfair,” wrote Alito in the dissent joined by Scalia.“

      C’mon, CNBC. Do better.

    20. „but in my judgment, that is unfair,” wrote Alito in the dissent joined by Scalia.“

      Somehow Scalia returned.

      Funny typo in the article.

    21. The 2 Justices who voted for, need to be removed from office, they’re 100% bought out.

    22. Of course Alito and Thomas are dissenting. Of all the traitorous conservatives they’re the most fascist.

    23. Tweedle_DeeDum on

      From the article…..
      >“The Court characterizes the District Court’s behavior during the period in question as ‘inaction,’ but in my judgment, that is unfair,” wrote Alito in the dissent joined by Scalia.

      ROFL.

    Leave A Reply