Now we get to watch Trump pointedly ignore TWO Supreme Court decisions! We better be careful. Three makes a constitutional crisis!
emperorsolo on
Victory, For now. Time will tell if the Fascists that occupy the executive branch will overtly undermine this ruling.
Ok_Document4031 on
Welp now enforce you’re ruling
VladtheInhaler999 on
Oh boy here it comes. 8647 one day, another court ruling against him the next. I don’t expect a thorough conversation, I’m here for an epic weekend meltdown. Same for pee wee German Stephan Miller and his little dog MTG too.
greiton on
rough day for Trump, small glimmer of hope for our Democracy.
hendy846 on
One side of me said glad SCOTUS got this right, the other part of me says like trump is gonna fucking stop
AWall925 on
1/ We all know which 2 dissented
2/ If I’m reading this right (and its very possible I’m not), then this is a big hand up to the immigrant group. Basically saying try again in the fifth circuit and if you don’t like that outcome then come to us.
3/ For anyone who’s getting their hopes *too* high, this isn’t them saying that deporting people using the Alien Enemies Act is unconstitutional (like this article title is hinting).
snvoigt on
Because Trump is known for following court orders he doesn’t like
spazzvogel on
Without teeth, this is useless… shit or get off the pot.
Ninevehenian on
There are some interesting points to be seen, SC is highly responsible for enabling the corruption and lawlessness, but them being people and seemingly having some limits to their behaviour makes the institution partially resilient vs. the more practical filth that musk and trumps idiocy constitute.
There is some value to having systems that rely on people mixed with systems that depend on bureaucracy.
allnadream on
> The court did not rule on whether the Alien Enemies Act, which the Trump administration invoked in mid-April to deport the detainees, had been applied correctly.
> “To be clear, we decide today only that the detainees are entitled to more notice than was given on April 18,” their ruling said.
It’s *something*, but the ruling was pretty limited, given they didn’t address the overall use of the Alien Enemies Act.
WeCameAsMuffins on
Alright Trump! You know what to do now, go on truth social and rant about how the Supreme Court are radical leftists and somehow get on about Biden!
viewless25 on
>The court did not rule on whether the Alien Enemies Act, which the Trump administration invoked in mid-April to deport the detainees, had been applied correctly.
>“To be clear, we decide today only that the detainees are entitled to more notice than was given on April 18,” their ruling said.
doorbell2021 on
At some point we’re going to have a post from him that ends mid-sentence as he strokes out from the stress of all his failures. There has to be a limit to how pissed off he can get before he pops, right?
Leadbelly82 on
Y’all will do nothing to stop him. He could be rotting in a cell right now
annaflixion on
Oh, good, they didn’t even bother to decide whether the Alien Enemies Act was applied correctly. I fucking hate this timeline. Not as much as the detainees have hated theirs re deportation, but I still hate it.
Lostsock1995 on
Unsurprising about our regular two dissenters 🙄 but still good news! Not sure what parts of this will hold in a government as crazy as ours, but I’ll take any step in the right direction even if it’s small
bhsn1pes on
With how much Trump has defied court orders like this over reaching power….one thinks what would’ve happened a couple years ago when Biden was handed a loss on the student loan thing and just ordered them forgiven anyways. The Republicans would be calling for his head. But here we are with Trump probably going to defy this order and both sides seemingly are just quiet because they’re scared. Spineless fucking cowards.
Unco_Slam on
Article cites that the court decided that Trump didn’t give them enough time or resources.
This isn’t „against trump“ it’s moreso the classic „kick the can down the road“
standuphilospher on
Shocker: Alito and Thomas with the dissent . Man fuck these guys
TheBoosThree on
Of course Alito and Thomas dissented
dkran on
The glaring conclusion from this ruling is Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito need to be arrested immediately, denied due process and habeus corpus, and immediately deported or “dealt with”, seeing as that’s how they think the world should work.
Buck_Thorn on
> the court said the Trump administration had not given the detainees enough time or adequate resources to challenge their deportations.
> “Under these circumstances, notice roughly 24 hours before removal, devoid of information about how to exercise due process rights to contest that removal, surely does not pass muster,” the ruling said.
That’s not exactly ruling against the whole thing, is it?
gorillafightsurvivor on
Haven’t opened the article yet, but I’m gonna go ahead and put my chips down on 7-2, Alito and Thomas dissenting.
Edit after opening the article: like clockwork.
Broncotron on
Who dissented?
Yep.
bibliophile224 on
We’ve got deceased justices now weighing in?
„“The Court characterizes the District Court’s behavior during the period in question as ‘inaction,’ but in my judgment, that is unfair,” wrote Alito in the dissent joined by Scalia.“
C’mon, CNBC. Do better.
dongballs613 on
Trump must go. Enough is enough.
seansman15 on
„but in my judgment, that is unfair,” wrote Alito in the dissent joined by Scalia.“
Somehow Scalia returned.
Funny typo in the article.
paulerxx on
The 2 Justices who voted for, need to be removed from office, they’re 100% bought out.
7figureipo on
Of course Alito and Thomas are dissenting. Of all the traitorous conservatives they’re the most fascist.
Tweedle_DeeDum on
From the article…..
>“The Court characterizes the District Court’s behavior during the period in question as ‘inaction,’ but in my judgment, that is unfair,” wrote Alito in the dissent joined by Scalia.
ROFL.
jpcapone on
Let me guess. 7 to 2. Am I right?
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
32 Kommentare
Now we get to watch Trump pointedly ignore TWO Supreme Court decisions! We better be careful. Three makes a constitutional crisis!
Victory, For now. Time will tell if the Fascists that occupy the executive branch will overtly undermine this ruling.
Welp now enforce you’re ruling
Oh boy here it comes. 8647 one day, another court ruling against him the next. I don’t expect a thorough conversation, I’m here for an epic weekend meltdown. Same for pee wee German Stephan Miller and his little dog MTG too.
rough day for Trump, small glimmer of hope for our Democracy.
One side of me said glad SCOTUS got this right, the other part of me says like trump is gonna fucking stop
1/ We all know which 2 dissented
2/ If I’m reading this right (and its very possible I’m not), then this is a big hand up to the immigrant group. Basically saying try again in the fifth circuit and if you don’t like that outcome then come to us.
3/ For anyone who’s getting their hopes *too* high, this isn’t them saying that deporting people using the Alien Enemies Act is unconstitutional (like this article title is hinting).
Because Trump is known for following court orders he doesn’t like
Without teeth, this is useless… shit or get off the pot.
There are some interesting points to be seen, SC is highly responsible for enabling the corruption and lawlessness, but them being people and seemingly having some limits to their behaviour makes the institution partially resilient vs. the more practical filth that musk and trumps idiocy constitute.
There is some value to having systems that rely on people mixed with systems that depend on bureaucracy.
> The court did not rule on whether the Alien Enemies Act, which the Trump administration invoked in mid-April to deport the detainees, had been applied correctly.
> “To be clear, we decide today only that the detainees are entitled to more notice than was given on April 18,” their ruling said.
It’s *something*, but the ruling was pretty limited, given they didn’t address the overall use of the Alien Enemies Act.
Alright Trump! You know what to do now, go on truth social and rant about how the Supreme Court are radical leftists and somehow get on about Biden!
>The court did not rule on whether the Alien Enemies Act, which the Trump administration invoked in mid-April to deport the detainees, had been applied correctly.
>“To be clear, we decide today only that the detainees are entitled to more notice than was given on April 18,” their ruling said.
At some point we’re going to have a post from him that ends mid-sentence as he strokes out from the stress of all his failures. There has to be a limit to how pissed off he can get before he pops, right?
Y’all will do nothing to stop him. He could be rotting in a cell right now
Oh, good, they didn’t even bother to decide whether the Alien Enemies Act was applied correctly. I fucking hate this timeline. Not as much as the detainees have hated theirs re deportation, but I still hate it.
Unsurprising about our regular two dissenters 🙄 but still good news! Not sure what parts of this will hold in a government as crazy as ours, but I’ll take any step in the right direction even if it’s small
With how much Trump has defied court orders like this over reaching power….one thinks what would’ve happened a couple years ago when Biden was handed a loss on the student loan thing and just ordered them forgiven anyways. The Republicans would be calling for his head. But here we are with Trump probably going to defy this order and both sides seemingly are just quiet because they’re scared. Spineless fucking cowards.
Article cites that the court decided that Trump didn’t give them enough time or resources.
This isn’t „against trump“ it’s moreso the classic „kick the can down the road“
Shocker: Alito and Thomas with the dissent . Man fuck these guys
Of course Alito and Thomas dissented
The glaring conclusion from this ruling is Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito need to be arrested immediately, denied due process and habeus corpus, and immediately deported or “dealt with”, seeing as that’s how they think the world should work.
> the court said the Trump administration had not given the detainees enough time or adequate resources to challenge their deportations.
> “Under these circumstances, notice roughly 24 hours before removal, devoid of information about how to exercise due process rights to contest that removal, surely does not pass muster,” the ruling said.
That’s not exactly ruling against the whole thing, is it?
Haven’t opened the article yet, but I’m gonna go ahead and put my chips down on 7-2, Alito and Thomas dissenting.
Edit after opening the article: like clockwork.
Who dissented?
Yep.
We’ve got deceased justices now weighing in?
„“The Court characterizes the District Court’s behavior during the period in question as ‘inaction,’ but in my judgment, that is unfair,” wrote Alito in the dissent joined by Scalia.“
C’mon, CNBC. Do better.
Trump must go. Enough is enough.
„but in my judgment, that is unfair,” wrote Alito in the dissent joined by Scalia.“
Somehow Scalia returned.
Funny typo in the article.
The 2 Justices who voted for, need to be removed from office, they’re 100% bought out.
Of course Alito and Thomas are dissenting. Of all the traitorous conservatives they’re the most fascist.
From the article…..
>“The Court characterizes the District Court’s behavior during the period in question as ‘inaction,’ but in my judgment, that is unfair,” wrote Alito in the dissent joined by Scalia.
ROFL.
Let me guess. 7 to 2. Am I right?