Hallo allerseits,
Ich wollte ein reales Beispiel dafür teilen, wie vorzeitiger Bereitstellung von KI-Tools bereits schwerwiegende Schäden verursacht.
An der Universität von Buffalo werden Studenten der akademischen Unehrlichkeit vorgeworfen, die ausschließlich auf KI -Erkennungswerten aus Turnitins Modell, ohne menschliche Überprüfung und ohne andere Beweise basiert. Sogar Turnitin warnt davor, dass ihr Tool nicht auf diese Weise verwendet werden sollte, aber Institutionen tun dies trotzdem.
Die Absolventen werden verzögert, die Schüler werden bestraft und es gibt keinen sinnvollen Berufungsverfahren. Es ist ein klarer Fall, wie schlechte KI-Einsatzentscheidungen in Kombination mit institutionellen Anreizen reale Schäden verursachen können.
Wir haben eine Petition gestartet, in der UB die KI -Erkennung als alleinige Grundlage für Anschuldigungen eingestellt hat. Wenn Sie an eine verantwortungsvolle KI -Entwicklung und -einstellung glauben, sollten Sie unterschreiben oder teilen.
Vielen Dank, dass Sie sich um die Zukunft gekümmert haben, die wir bauen,
Students Are Being Punished Based on Flawed AI Models. This Is the Future We Are Facing
byu/Kelspider-48 inFuturology
7 Kommentare
There have been cheat detection tooling in colleges for years, they were using some form of it back in the 2010’s when I was in college and it was error-prone then too. Academic laziness is the problem here, not AI tools. Tools to detect cheating will always exist and they will always be sold to academia. They did their part by telling them it’s not 100% accurate, the college is the one screwing up here.
so, what other evidence are you requesting?
Typically when dealing with someone dishonest you dont show your entire hand, you point out half of the problem and then see if they correct the entire problem, or only what they were „caught“ out on.
Look – in truth we need to deal with the very real educational issue of school work products may need to come from and stay in the schools without the old cheat we used to do of homework. Homework itself may be outmoded.
Calculators used to be something that would be taken from students on certain tests and it wasn’t an accident.
It’s impossible to ask kids not to cheat when their friends may do it and get better scores than them (and lets be honest, Rich kids often just had tutors that performed the same function). But there is a very real thing here which is, in order to be smart enough to use a tool effectively, you have to have a base level of skill of what you’re doing to begin with. And by the way – it’s not like we’re not catching teachers cheating back with the same tools.
Kids can’t develop those faculties if they never are applying. You don’t get to calculus without arithmitic, algebra, trig, etc. If you’ve been faking your knowledge from the start, we can teach you the subject but you’re wasting your time. „The point“ of many parts of school are to actually be hard, to force a child to develop competency they don’t have yet. Do most people need Calculus? No. But if you’ve forced yourself through it, the arithmetic/algebra of a majority of business is a non-issue.
I’d love an open discussion about how AI is going to disrupt the entire education field, as anyone can compete now.
I’d also argue that it needs to be embraced because it is truly an amazing tool for human growth.
In the meantime? take advantage while you can!
> Even Turnitin warns that their tool should not be used this way
We’re 25 years into using honor-based systems like this in Big Tech (“pretty please don’t do this or that”) and yet we still haven’t learned.
Making people check a tickbox that basically says “I promise pinky swear” and acting shocked when people break the toothless promise is stupid.
This issue predates AI. And broader than just students (criminal prosecution and determining sentencing/probation is another big one).
Read Weapons of Math Destruction, this sort of black box data algorithm model and the dangers of it with a lot of concrete examples is the point of the book.
This is one of the thing that should never happen with AI: it must be used as a tool by humans and not as a tool to substitute humans.
I can see teachers using AI to help them find the students cheating, they know them and AI adds more info to evaluate the issue.
But AI without human review to punish students? Dystopia!