Share.

    48 Kommentare

    1. There are far fewer employers who hire undocumented immigrants. Maybe put them on trial, instead.

    2. User-Name-8675309 on

      Oh he says they can…he’s just using hyperbole to say it would take “200 years.” The old liar.

    3. La-Boheme-1896 on

      Then maybe the US wants to deport too many people.

      Maybe the US should ascertain that it has a *reason* to want to deport people, before bundling them into a van and sending them to the worst prisons in the world.

    4. LordBinaryPossum on

      Bullshit because ice is snatching people at court House when they show up.

    5. Next he’ll be like, „We can’t afford to deport and jail all these immigrants, so we need a more final solution.“

    6. TopEagle4012 on

      Hmmm… with Murkowski and Roberts starting to get uneasy and Hegseth blowing up, I better find some Reichstag reason to declare martial law very soon…

    7. reddittorbrigade on

      Biden should have never given this felon the due process.

      Biden should have deported this terrorist and sex offender straight to El Salvador.

    8. avid-learner-bot on

      It’s completely ridiculous to suggest it would take 200 years to deport the people his administration wants to remove, especially considering the statement originated on Truth Social, a platform not exactly known for its rigorous fact-checking, furthermore, I find it incredibly concerning that we’re accepting this timeframe as a realistic assessment, because what are we assuming about the processes involved, and are they truly that complex?

    9. Constitution says you can’t deport them without one…so next time a MAGA tries to tell you something about defending the Constitution you can laugh in their face

    10. i-read-it-again on

      Come on Americans. Can you see North Korea yet. It’s getting closer. Not far now

    11. Ok, then amnesty it is. The last amnesty was done by Reagan in the 80s.
      Oh wait, that won’t work, because the cruelty is the point. How can you energize your supporters without vilifying migrant workers and asylees? People will start noticing the economy going into the shitter.

    12. ChaskaChanhassen on

      Next, with US citizens:

      Trump says US cannot give everyone he wants to imprison a fair trial.

    13. Okay then you cannot expect people to go to a death camp without resistance. Trump, I hope you know that you will get the Mussolini treatment in the end. Fascist fuck

    14. Basic_Quantity_9430 on

      The Constitution demands that thru get due process. Trump is saying that his intent is to not follow the Constitution, if that was not already clear.

    15. Trump seemed fine with his trials. He thinks as a rapist and impeached president his trash words hold any value around the world?

    16. It has always been every fat old rich guy’s MO to break the law and see if anyone does anything about it, settle out of court for large sums of cash typically. He also slows down the judicial process with spam appeals, escalations and other time wasters. We all saw the supreme court take bribes and then change their law to make bribes legal so. Yeah. we would be better off if we had just all conned the MAGA suckers ourselves so they had no money left to donate to this fat piece of trash

    17. 5minArgument on

      I will always blame this problem on those that created it, Republicans.

      In 2006 when „the problem“ started, Republicans blocked immigration reform.

      Then again in 2015 when „the problem“ continued, Republicans blocked immigration reform.

      Again, in 2024.

      Hundreds of new immigration judges and courts would have been operational, thousands of added border patrol would have been on hand and things like ‚E-verify‘ would have already been implemented decades ago, if Republicans hadn’t blocked it.

      Comical that these folk have any credibility on this issue.

    18. Wonder-Machine on

      Then don’t deport every brown person you hate because youre a bunch of racists

    19. Crusty_Musty_Fudge on

      Because the point was always to mass deport brown ppl.

      It was never about Legal vs illegal.

    20. Well then immediately deport the entire disgusting Trump blood line without a trial. As they want and deserve.

    21. wanderingpeddlar on

      Hey Trump if you stopped deporting people that are here with full permission and documentation and focused on the people you claim to want to be deporting that problem would go away.

    22. Trollin_Da_Ether on

      Then maybe overhaul the whole immigration system so that it works instead of being just another political chess piece.

    23. We can’t give everyone in the Trump admin an impeachment trial so jail them all.

    24. JusticeJaunt on

      Okay but the constitution doesn’t give a fuck and says to give them the trial. Dickhead in chief doesn’t supersede that.

    25. What other parts of the Constitution will Trump selectively choose to enforce? It will be the ones that empower him. Free speech, right to assemble, right to bear arms, the right to worship your way, and the right to vote could be next. His oath of office does not give exceptions about defending the Constitution.

    26. It’s called due process and everyone is entitled to it.
      But look at the felon telling everyone else what law and order is🙄

    27. We absolutely can give everyone a trial and we will.

      What he means is that he doesn’t want to give everyone a trial as he knows he is breaking the law and not giving legal citizens due process. Nor does he care if he is breaking the law and deporting legal citizens, simply because he wants to or if they have an opinion counter to his.

      Looks like his illegal deportation plans will be on hold indefinitely now.

    28. If you cannot give them due process, you cannot deport them. End of story. Follow the fucking law asshole and STOP breaking it.

    29. sophietehbeanz on

      Dude, yes it can and the US should, every time for everyone. That’s it.

    30. thischaosiskillingme on

      This is exactly what we went through after 9/11. Republicans, eager to shred the Constitution’s protections for Americans, put it through a vicious test run against Muslims. They insisted, without evidence, that the American legal system was too smol and weak to handle terrorists.

      It handled John Wayne Gacy, Jeffrey Dahmer, and Ted Bundy.

      It handled Timothy McVeigh, Eric Rudolph, Ted Kaczynski, and Ramzi Yousef.

      When did the American legal system become ineligible to try terrorism and gang and murder cases? There are laws on the books we can try them for breaking. There’s no reason to pretend we can’t. We absolutely can! We not only have the capacity to, we have the *duty* to.

    31. prodigalpariah on

      Oh so we can just decide the law doesn’t have to be followed if we really, really don’t wanna follow it?

    32. Sure we can, it’ll just take a while. Oh, and some commitment to the foundations that make this country truly great, as well as the reasons we rebelled from the UK; it’ll take that, too.

    33. No_Pressure_1289 on

      Yes, the US can give them all hearings and/or trials because all individuals have a right to due process according to the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. It just will cost millions of dollars. Money that would pay the federal worker’s who lost their jobs and other things the federal government’s doge has cut.

    Leave A Reply