KI könnte 40% der Arbeitsplätze betreffen und die Ungleichheit zwischen den Nationen erweitern, warnt die UN -Künstlungs -Intelligenz bis 2033, dass die Marktwert von 4,8 Billionen US -Dollar für den Marktwert von 4,8 Billionen US -Dollar erreicht wird.

From the article

Artificial intelligence is projected to reach $4.8 trillion in market value by 2033, but the technology’s benefits remain highly concentrated, according to the U.N. Trade and Development agency.

In a [report](https://unctad.org/press-material/ais-48-trillion-future-un-trade-and-development-alerts-divides-urges-action) released on Thursday, UNCTAD said the AI market cap would roughly equate to the size of Germany’s economy, with the technology offering productivity gains and driving digital transformation. 

However, the agency also raised concerns about automation and job displacement, warning that AI could affect 40% of jobs worldwide. On top of that, AI is not inherently inclusive, meaning the economic gains from the tech remain “highly concentrated,” the report added. 

“The benefits of AI-driven automation often favour capital over labour, which could widen inequality and reduce the competitive advantage of low-cost labour in developing economies,” it said. 

I work at a small meat processing plant that handles the “last mile” of production before it hits your plate. I feel this type of work is fairly immune to any AI interference. That being said, I’d be interested to know how it could be incorporated. Or more so how similar production could be effected.

My assumption when “they” talk about AI overtake it means coding; IP software, general medical, or even college databases.

It’d be nice if we had an administration that was focused on transitioning those positions into a more hands on role. If I remember correctly, that was attempted during the Obama era while we were in the recession of ‘08.

of course, anything that increases efficiency reduces manpower and thus reduces jobs and creates more poor people.

Eventually, we will have everything running so efficiently it can all be done by a single Australian man.

At that point, we move to the next phase of civilization: Post Scarcity. It will no longer be an issue of dividing resources based on who pays the most but instead just dividing evenly, fairly, and probably focusing some resources on those that need that resource the most.

Like, if you want more jobs, then just ban tractors. Ban automated manufacturing. Ban anything that reduces the number of people needed for a job and boom, more jobs available. ^(/s)