OpenAI & Anthropic haben beide Anforderungen an chinesische KI -Modelle gestellt, die aus nationalen Sicherheitsgründen in den USA verboten werden sollen. Obwohl es sich um wahre Länder handelt, die Grund haben, die Technologie anderer Länder zu misstrauen, bezweifle ich, dass dies der wahre Grund ist, warum sie verärgert sind.
Ihr großes Problem ist, dass Open-Source AI ihre Chancen auf Nachfolger als Unternehmen vernichtet. Das Modell der VC-Finanzierung von Silicon Valley ist es, auf viele kleine Start-ups zu wetten, in der Hoffnung, dass man ein „Einhorn“ wird-ein Unternehmen in Höhe von mehreren Milliarden Dollar (wie Google, Meta usw.), die eine Branche dominieren und in Hunderten von Milliarden Dollar kehren können.
Auch wenn es ihnen gelingt, chinesische Open -Source zu verbieten, heißt das, dass sie Einhörner werden? Ich bezweifle es. Die chinesischen Open-Source-KI-Modelle sind ihren überlegen. Der größte Teil der Welt wird sie nutzen, und die wirkliche KI -Innovation wird im Rest der Welt stattfinden. In der Zwischenzeit werden die Amerikaner mit der zweitbesten KI auskommen, die nur dann überleben kann, wenn sie am besten verboten wird.
Outperformed by Chinese Open-Source AI, US firms want their government to ban it.
byu/lughnasadh inFuturology
15 Kommentare
The capitalists sure are scared of competition, it’s almost like they need government to protect their interests. No hypocrisy there
Unless you can ban it from existing at all, that seems counterproductive to the notion of innovating and regaining a compelling lead. Is this them admitting they can’t?
If this is all open source, adopt their innovations and carry them forward into your next creation so you can realize the advantage too.
I get the argument that their innovation requires OpenAI to have done “all the expensive work” ahead of them so in that sense it might seem unfair and if it wasn’t open source they could possibly pursue damages. But banning something that is openly available based on something that is openly available is not just saying “you can’t do that” is also weirdly implying “we can’t do better with it.”
You know EXACTLY why they want to ban it: loss of profits.
I thought that him and his clique were “Libertarians”?
Why are they asking the government for help?
Same deal as Chinese EVs, they’re too good for too low of a price, so just ban them and make people pay more or go without, increasingly the latter as wealth consolidates.
Any country that bans any one else’s AI is immediately at a disadvantage because AIs can be trained on each other, like I’m pretty sure Deepseek was using OpenAI’s own AI training, and then adding upon it.
Not to mention the fact that OpenAI, Anthropic (Claude.ai) and all the rest are literally being trained on stolen data anyway. They should be laughed out of the room for crying about being out performed.
hehe. All these Almans and other technobros are so far from understanding how modern information technologies work that it’s just ridiculous. Ban something on the Internet. That’s great!
Also Facebook illegally torrented copyright books for training their AI. The Chinese trained their AI on US models so haven’t broken copyright laws downloading from the torrent websites. Though of course it may still be illegal to distribute copyright material.
Hey look it’s the real communists in the room, who act just like their old
„Experts in central planning in a given field“ oligarch in the USSR counterparts.
If it threatens my monopoly, ban it.
If we can steal or figure out how it works and reverse engineer it, do it.
But in the meantime until I catch up? Ban it.
Here’s a thought. Follow their white paper, and use their AI yourselves, learn from it, do it better. You have more resources than they do, use them.
Banning is never a good thing for consumers, although China is good at doing that.
The fucking nerve of this guy. He takes a previously non-profit AI company whose dedication to open source principles was was right there in the name, wants to make it for-profit and hasn’t released anything open source in years, and is arguing in open court that he should be allowed to hoover up terabytes of copyrighted material for free and with no limits or compensation of any kind. And then when someone uses his AI’s data to train another model which IS made open source, he not only conveniently gains a new appreciation for intellectual property, but he demands it be banned.
He’s right up there with the Muskrat and the Motherzucker for being among the scummiest tech bros in America if not the world.
Government was made to protect the profits of the wealthy and nobody else.
„Daddy, the mean asian people are making a better product at a lower cost than me! Make them go away!!!“
– American Corporations since forever.
Yet I also read that Deepseek isn’t better and the whole thing was just another Chinese bullshit hype job
“Chinese” open-source AI **trained on American and other foreign LLMs.**
As always, the Chinese make big claims but when there’s no more leader to siphon progress off of, don’t expect this same breakthrough.