Close Menu
    Das Schiffsschiff 34 von Starship könnte gerade verloren gegangen sein
    Weltraum

    Das Schiffsschiff 34 von Starship könnte gerade verloren gegangen sein


    Überarbeitung des Titels: Es ist jetzt gut weg. Trümmer sind inzwischen wahrscheinlich in den Ozean gestoßen.

    Menschen in den Türken und Caicos beobachten den Himmel. Wenn ihr Fotos oder Filmmaterial der Trümmer finden kann, poste es hier so schnell wie möglich. Ich werde alle 5 Minuten Kommentare durchkämmen, um nach neuen Filmmaterial oder Fotos des Vorfalls zu suchen.

    VID von Switch8000 gefunden, zeigt die Explosion von Boynton Beach, FL.

    https://x.com/briancjackson/status/1897795245531881931

    Vid gefunden von LevraimonamibaAus dem Wasser, eines der besten Videos ab sofort

    https://kick.com/wvagabond/clips/clip_01jnpxetmphan0y6dxjz4xh7v6

    Mehrere Ansichten von gefunden von U/Trib_

    2. Ansicht: https://x.com/genedoctorb/status/1897796417634046212

    3. Ansicht: https://x.com/jwmuk/status/1897797542307344801

    4. Ansicht: https://x.com/artyio3o/status/1897798204738916500

    5. Ansicht: https://x.com/danielepico_/status/1897798580041048064

    6. Ansicht: https://x.com/seeclickflash/status/1897796382221910338

    7. Ansicht: https://x.com/genedoctorb/status/1897799896465306104

    Fand einen von genedoctor auf x.

    https://x.com/genedoctorb/status/1897798175081005540

    Starship's Ship 34 may have just been lost
    byu/riceman090 inspace

    Share.
    View 18 Comments

    18 Kommentare

    1. SuperRiveting on

      Yep. Engines failed, asymmetric thrust, started tumbling.

      Booster landing was different as well, more off to the side as if the chops had to really compensate for the booster location being off. Not sure if that part was intentional at the time of posting this comment.

      E: booster boost back had 2 engines out and I believe landing had 1 engine out.

    3. Steve490 on

      Booster catch pretty much becoming near routine now is a great milestone. Not many will be talking about it and focusing on the ship. Which is pretty notable on it’s own. Starship V2 did make a *little* bit of progress compared to Flight 7. We all know it’s pretty much a brand new vehicle. We are going through the flight 1-3 days again with it and I know they’ll have it running as it should soon enough. Excellent work everyone at SpaceX. Can’t wait for Flight 9 in 1 1/2 months or so.

    5. No-Connection7765 on

      Is there video of this? I just turned on the livestream as it was ending. 

    6. Fwcasey on

      Looks like their changes between Block 1 and Block 2 of starship have not gone to plan in regards to the survivability of the vessel. Seems like they may have taken several steps back.

    7. comradejenkens on

      Reckon it will be Turks and Caicos again? Actually looking at it, failure seems to have happened at an almost identical point, so you might be right.

    9. OnlyAnEssenceThief on

      First: it’s funny how two deja vu type incidents plagued two space missions on the same day (see: IM-2).

      Second, this probably warrants a longer grounding and more careful examination by SpaceX. It’s not like them to have a consistent failure mode like this, especially not during launch (landing’s obviously a whole different beast). Now, I’m not saying they can’t do what they always do (break fast, learn fast), but when you get a by-and-large repeat of your past flight, that warrants some extra consideration.

    10. BeanAndBanoffeePie on

      Going backwards every launch, sounds like karma has caught up to the ketamine monster

    12. SonOfThomasWayne on

      No problem at all. FAA (spacex) will say they know what happened and give them a licence to launch again next week.

    13. ace17708 on

      When does it get removed from Artemis? It’s clearly not going to work on NASAs timeline if at all… The alternative lander with blue origin seems like the best choice and its not even tested yet… what a mess

    15. rocketjack5 on

      Lost all 3 spacecraft on the clips mission (lunar trailblazer, astroforge Odin, and Intuitive machines lander today). Now Starship does even worse than last mission.
      NASA’s strategy of moving from primes to startups would seem to be suspect…

    16. PommesMayo on

      It seems the Ship2 design is flawed. The ship made it like what 10 seconds further than last time? Ship1 did the flight profile even under deliberately harder circumstances. This is a huge step backwards for them. This is bad

    17. AgreeableEmploy1884 on

      I’m quite confident in Starship eventually becoming successful but two ship failures back to back is NOT good.

    18. JanrisJanitor on

      Got to hand it to SpaceX. They make the hard, never before done part look easy and the somewhat more straightforward part of getting a second stage into space incredibly hard.

    Leave A Reply