Canada should seek closer ties with Britain because its nuclear weapons can help protect the country against Donald Trump, a Liberal party leader running to replace Justin Trudeau has said.
Chrystia Freeland, the former deputy prime minister under Mr Trudeau, said that US president is “clearly threatening our sovereignty” with his campaign to absorb Canada as the 51st state of America.
In order to “guarantee our security”, Ms Freeland said she would build closer security partnerships with European Nato allies and “I would be sure that France and Britain were there, who possess nuclear weapons”.
“I would be working urgently with those partners to build a closer security relationship… in a time when the United States can be a threat,” said the ex-foreign minister and finance minister at the final Liberal leadership debate last week.
The Liberal party has overtaken the Conservatives in the polls for the first time since 2021, surging on a backlash to Mr Trump and his mockery of Mr Trudeau as merely “Governor” of Canada.
Ms Freeland is running second in the race to Mark Carney, the former governor of the Bank of England. She draws 31 per cent of voters against Mr Carney’s 43 per cent, a poll for Mainstreet Research found last week. Results are due on March 9.
The suggestion that Canada should seek to avail itself of Britain’s nuclear umbrella against the United States was criticised by Ms Freeland’s political opponents.
“I think that that was an insane thing to say,” said Danielle Smith, the conservative premier of Alberta, Canada’s wealthiest province.
“As if somehow we’re going to have a nuclear threat from the United States or counter some kind of nuclear threat,” Ms Smith told The Telegraph.
“The US is our friend and allied security partner,” she said, citing the North American Aerospace Defence Command (Norad) alliance, in which Canada and the United States share air defence of the continent.
“During 9/11 it was a Canadian commander that was giving direction on North American airspace on where those planes needed to land [he redirected US air traffic to Canadian bases]. That’s how integrated we are on the security front.”
“So anyone suggesting otherwise is just being silly.”
Britain’s Trident nuclear submarines rely on missiles and warhead designs from the United States, with which the UK shares nuclear materials, research and training under the 1958 US-UK mutual defence agreement.
In December, Ms Freeland dramatically resigned from Mr Trudeau’s government, revealing in an open letter that she had resisted “costly political gimmicks” as finance minister in order to face the challenge of looming US tariffs.
With his popularity at record lows, Mr Trudeau had offered Canadians a $250 CAD (£135) cash rebate and implemented a two-month holiday on General Sales Tax.
Meanwhile back at the bat cave, Elon continues his plan to gut as much infrastructure as possible and replace it with private industry.
stroopwafelling on
In the Cold War, Europe had to ask whether the United States was willing to trade Seattle for Paris – whether they would risk a nuclear exchange with the USSR to honour their security guarantees to Europe against Russia.
Now, we’re seriously asking if the UK is willing to trade London for Toronto – to threaten a launch of atomic weapons against the United States to protect Canada from being conquered by our neighbour.
I’m astounded that it has come to this.
DarthKrataa on
It is utterly insane to me that this is now part of the national conversation
WontelMilliams on
A natural consequence of MAGA foreign policy buffoonery is nuclear proliferation.
EinStubentiger on
Why is nobody addressing the real question of how a nuclear exchange would impact egg prices?
NatMapVex on
Well, DonOLD Dump has well and done it, we’re just completely the bad guys now, and in the dumbest way possible, we’re purposefully destroying an international order built and led by ourselves and our allies for our own benefit and security. I don’t even know how to cope, I just keep thinking about what Musk and Dump are doing everyday; its so stressful. All so this orange turd can get conned by Vladibitch Pooh-tin on false promises of a US-Russia success story.
ThucydidesButthurt on
The US is now officially a failed state? Our system of checks and balances has utterly failed
Stoic_Vagabond on
When anti-intellectualism is celebrated, this is what you get
Sudden_Choice2321 on
People are losing their minds. Freeland is losing big to Carney and feels she needs to make a statement. She just ended her political career.
WillyNilly1997 on
Trade _____ for _____
FluffnPuff_Rebirth on
Fact of the matter is that EU/Canada never were equal partners to US. It was always Pax Americana. US puts military bases on their territories, and in turn they sign whatever papers US presents them. That was the deal.
This idea that US funding Europe’s defense was some gift among equals needs to be challenged more. EU was a vassal, and still is. And Americans acting that they’d be fine if EU „just paid their due“ don’t realize, that if EU did, it would make EU equal to US, which would change the relationship quite a bit.
Let’s say that EU puts on the big boy pants and pays for its own defense. What now? Will EU go on and sign trade deals with US like it did without hesitation in the past, or will it throw its weight around like Trump did with Greenland? Yeah. Many Americans think that strong Europe will be like the docile Europe of today but cheaper to upkeep, rather than a rival superpower.
Don’t get me wrong. I am not saying that US were some horrible imperial dictators towards Europe. When it comes to vassal relations, US by far has been very very gentle in that regard. That still doesn’t change the fact that Europe has always been the little brother vassal. Europe isn’t this amicable out of nature, but because of circumstance.
If Europe is going to wear big boy pants, it should also give it the capability to throw its weight around like a big boy. Sometimes in the direction of US. Trump’s Greenland thing alone is in my opinion more outrageous than any of this Ukraine aid drama. Imagine if EU went that „Actually Bermuda is European, btw. And we aren’t taking military options off the table, thanks for asking“ Americans would be wise to be a bit wary regarding EU leadership at that point.
One_Bison_5139 on
Freeland is a quack, and this is coming from a Canadian. She also has zero chance of beating Carney in the leadership race.
_A_Monkey on
Some bad news: UK’s nuclear weapons are, operationally, independent of the US but they aren’t entirely independent of proprietary tech, maintenance and updates from the US.
RedditTipiak on
Donnons des charges nucléaires et des Rafale à nos cousins québecois.
Et apprenons leur notre propre méthode de dissuasion nucléaire.
Tabarnak d’ostie de calice !
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
15 Kommentare
***The Telegraph reports***:
Canada should seek closer ties with Britain because its nuclear weapons can help protect the country against Donald Trump, a Liberal party leader running to replace Justin Trudeau has said.
Chrystia Freeland, the former deputy prime minister under Mr Trudeau, said that US president is “clearly threatening our sovereignty” with his campaign to absorb Canada as the 51st state of America.
In order to “guarantee our security”, Ms Freeland said she would build closer security partnerships with European Nato allies and “I would be sure that France and Britain were there, who possess nuclear weapons”.
“I would be working urgently with those partners to build a closer security relationship… in a time when the United States can be a threat,” said the ex-foreign minister and finance minister at the final Liberal leadership debate last week.
The Liberal party has overtaken the Conservatives in the polls for the first time since 2021, surging on a backlash to Mr Trump and his mockery of Mr Trudeau as merely “Governor” of Canada.
Ms Freeland is running second in the race to Mark Carney, the former governor of the Bank of England. She draws 31 per cent of voters against Mr Carney’s 43 per cent, a poll for Mainstreet Research found last week. Results are due on March 9.
The suggestion that Canada should seek to avail itself of Britain’s nuclear umbrella against the United States was criticised by Ms Freeland’s political opponents.
“I think that that was an insane thing to say,” said Danielle Smith, the conservative premier of Alberta, Canada’s wealthiest province.
“As if somehow we’re going to have a nuclear threat from the United States or counter some kind of nuclear threat,” Ms Smith told The Telegraph.
“The US is our friend and allied security partner,” she said, citing the North American Aerospace Defence Command (Norad) alliance, in which Canada and the United States share air defence of the continent.
“During 9/11 it was a Canadian commander that was giving direction on North American airspace on where those planes needed to land [he redirected US air traffic to Canadian bases]. That’s how integrated we are on the security front.”
“So anyone suggesting otherwise is just being silly.”
Britain’s Trident nuclear submarines rely on missiles and warhead designs from the United States, with which the UK shares nuclear materials, research and training under the 1958 US-UK mutual defence agreement.
In December, Ms Freeland dramatically resigned from Mr Trudeau’s government, revealing in an open letter that she had resisted “costly political gimmicks” as finance minister in order to face the challenge of looming US tariffs.
With his popularity at record lows, Mr Trudeau had offered Canadians a $250 CAD (£135) cash rebate and implemented a two-month holiday on General Sales Tax.
**Full story:** [**https://www.telegraph.co.uk/us/politics/2025/03/03/british-nuclear-weapons-canada-trump-chrystia-freeland/**](https://www.telegraph.co.uk/us/politics/2025/03/03/british-nuclear-weapons-canada-trump-chrystia-freeland/)
Meanwhile back at the bat cave, Elon continues his plan to gut as much infrastructure as possible and replace it with private industry.
In the Cold War, Europe had to ask whether the United States was willing to trade Seattle for Paris – whether they would risk a nuclear exchange with the USSR to honour their security guarantees to Europe against Russia.
Now, we’re seriously asking if the UK is willing to trade London for Toronto – to threaten a launch of atomic weapons against the United States to protect Canada from being conquered by our neighbour.
I’m astounded that it has come to this.
It is utterly insane to me that this is now part of the national conversation
A natural consequence of MAGA foreign policy buffoonery is nuclear proliferation.
Why is nobody addressing the real question of how a nuclear exchange would impact egg prices?
Well, DonOLD Dump has well and done it, we’re just completely the bad guys now, and in the dumbest way possible, we’re purposefully destroying an international order built and led by ourselves and our allies for our own benefit and security. I don’t even know how to cope, I just keep thinking about what Musk and Dump are doing everyday; its so stressful. All so this orange turd can get conned by Vladibitch Pooh-tin on false promises of a US-Russia success story.
The US is now officially a failed state? Our system of checks and balances has utterly failed
When anti-intellectualism is celebrated, this is what you get
People are losing their minds. Freeland is losing big to Carney and feels she needs to make a statement. She just ended her political career.
Trade _____ for _____
Fact of the matter is that EU/Canada never were equal partners to US. It was always Pax Americana. US puts military bases on their territories, and in turn they sign whatever papers US presents them. That was the deal.
This idea that US funding Europe’s defense was some gift among equals needs to be challenged more. EU was a vassal, and still is. And Americans acting that they’d be fine if EU „just paid their due“ don’t realize, that if EU did, it would make EU equal to US, which would change the relationship quite a bit.
Let’s say that EU puts on the big boy pants and pays for its own defense. What now? Will EU go on and sign trade deals with US like it did without hesitation in the past, or will it throw its weight around like Trump did with Greenland? Yeah. Many Americans think that strong Europe will be like the docile Europe of today but cheaper to upkeep, rather than a rival superpower.
Don’t get me wrong. I am not saying that US were some horrible imperial dictators towards Europe. When it comes to vassal relations, US by far has been very very gentle in that regard. That still doesn’t change the fact that Europe has always been the little brother vassal. Europe isn’t this amicable out of nature, but because of circumstance.
If Europe is going to wear big boy pants, it should also give it the capability to throw its weight around like a big boy. Sometimes in the direction of US. Trump’s Greenland thing alone is in my opinion more outrageous than any of this Ukraine aid drama. Imagine if EU went that „Actually Bermuda is European, btw. And we aren’t taking military options off the table, thanks for asking“ Americans would be wise to be a bit wary regarding EU leadership at that point.
Freeland is a quack, and this is coming from a Canadian. She also has zero chance of beating Carney in the leadership race.
Some bad news: UK’s nuclear weapons are, operationally, independent of the US but they aren’t entirely independent of proprietary tech, maintenance and updates from the US.
Donnons des charges nucléaires et des Rafale à nos cousins québecois.
Et apprenons leur notre propre méthode de dissuasion nucléaire.
Tabarnak d’ostie de calice !