Eliot A. Cohen: “There is a rule in politics never to ascribe to malignity what one can explain through incompetence and stupidity. This approach has become difficult to sustain in the case of the Trump administration. But there is another possibility: Both explanations operate simultaneously …”
“Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, for example, was speaking the truth when he said at the Munich Security Conference that a Ukrainian cease-fire will probably freeze the battle lines and not involve NATO membership. But Senator Roger Wicker, chair of the Senate Armed Services Committee, was equally correct in calling it a rookie mistake to have given away one’s position in advance. Hegseth stumbled through a retraction, but the damage was done …”
“The latest meeting in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, between an American delegation consisting of the secretary of state, the national security adviser, and a special envoy with two experienced Russian diplomats was even worse. It was a meeting about Ukraine without Ukraine—a move calculated to make the Ukrainian leadership less tractable. It was a meeting about a European war not only without Europeans, but without the slightest consultation with them. Instead, the U.S. made concessions to the Russians—promising to let them send intelligence operatives masquerading as diplomats back to their embassy in Washington without extracting anything in return.
“The Trump administration seems not to realize that the Russians are the ones in trouble, not us; that they are the ones with a faltering economy, a stalemated war, and more than three-quarters of a million casualties. Most important, the administration refuses to see Russia under President Vladimir Putin for what it is: a predatory dictatorship bent on rebuilding an empire on the bodies of its former subjects …”
“The negotiators displayed mainly incompetence, as well as cringeworthy servility to their master in the White House. Trump’s part, though, was pure malignity. Shortly after the meeting ended, he criticized Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, lied about the latter’s polling numbers, and said, in a particularly callous remark, that Ukraine had had a seat at the table for three years. How being invaded and having your civilians tortured, raped, and slaughtered counts as a seat at the table is beyond understanding.”
Right now the most important thing to say is: „Modern reality is partly UK guilt, and because of this, UK should lead its resolution.“
I know, I know, but hear me out.
ALL OF THIS BEGUN FROM THE USA+UK BRILLIANT DECISION TO BAN SOVIET CRITICISM DURING NUREMBERG TRIALS!
Anyone, including the best analytics, historians, officials could say absolutely whatever they want, but almost all modern problems begun from this:
„Those who do not learn history are doomed to repeat it. During 1945-2025 years USA+UK didn’t provide enough information for people so they could fully learn WW2 lessons and not repeat them.
THEREFORE THEY JUST DON’T!
They received vaccine, but too weak one.
In the 1960s this lead to adaptation by Americans NKVD-like sociopathic/utilitarian Political Realism, separation of moral from politics, and politics from economy.
Which in turn lead to normalization of trade with autocratic regimes for the USA and Europe.
Which lead to re-investment of spent on autocracies money into disinformation and propaganda.
Which revive all of what USA+UK+West wanted to bury really deep.“
Only after recognition of THIS root case ANYONE can say ANYTHING about SOMETHING else. Because EVERYTHING ELSE WAS AND WILL BE LESS IMPORTANT.
In other words, if during 1945-2024 years (especially in 1991 year) there was full disclosure of truth about USSR/Russia, or if there was Nuremberg Trials about USSR crimes, USA wouldn’t become so similar to USSR/Russia.
Why exactly sentence „Modern reality is partly UK guilt, and because of this, UK should lead its resolution“?
Because right now Europe need something specific, fulcrum. The sentence: „It’s PARTLY UK error, therefore UK should KNOW MORE about it than everyone else, therefore LEAD“ can be such fulcrum.
Far_wide on
Speaking as a UK & European citizen, this whole situation is frankly horrifying. We’ve moved in the space of a week from being concerned that Ukraine could be hung out to dry, to it now seeming that that is only the half of it – the US is more interested in forming a long term alliance with Russia than protecting democracy.
Perhaps many ordinary Americans are barely even cogniscent of how major this is at this point (not people here, I know), and might even not care – thinking it doesn’t affect them – but if the leadership of the USA is no longer concerned by petty trivia such as „democracy“ then it will also be Americans who are now going to live in an autocracy too and a lot of freedoms and strengths long fought for are going to be lost.
I wasn’t looking forward to 4 more years of Trump, but this looks far worse than I had expected and it is for just about everyone except Putin.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
3 Kommentare
Eliot A. Cohen: “There is a rule in politics never to ascribe to malignity what one can explain through incompetence and stupidity. This approach has become difficult to sustain in the case of the Trump administration. But there is another possibility: Both explanations operate simultaneously …”
“Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, for example, was speaking the truth when he said at the Munich Security Conference that a Ukrainian cease-fire will probably freeze the battle lines and not involve NATO membership. But Senator Roger Wicker, chair of the Senate Armed Services Committee, was equally correct in calling it a rookie mistake to have given away one’s position in advance. Hegseth stumbled through a retraction, but the damage was done …”
“The latest meeting in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, between an American delegation consisting of the secretary of state, the national security adviser, and a special envoy with two experienced Russian diplomats was even worse. It was a meeting about Ukraine without Ukraine—a move calculated to make the Ukrainian leadership less tractable. It was a meeting about a European war not only without Europeans, but without the slightest consultation with them. Instead, the U.S. made concessions to the Russians—promising to let them send intelligence operatives masquerading as diplomats back to their embassy in Washington without extracting anything in return.
“The Trump administration seems not to realize that the Russians are the ones in trouble, not us; that they are the ones with a faltering economy, a stalemated war, and more than three-quarters of a million casualties. Most important, the administration refuses to see Russia under President Vladimir Putin for what it is: a predatory dictatorship bent on rebuilding an empire on the bodies of its former subjects …”
“The negotiators displayed mainly incompetence, as well as cringeworthy servility to their master in the White House. Trump’s part, though, was pure malignity. Shortly after the meeting ended, he criticized Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, lied about the latter’s polling numbers, and said, in a particularly callous remark, that Ukraine had had a seat at the table for three years. How being invaded and having your civilians tortured, raped, and slaughtered counts as a seat at the table is beyond understanding.”
Read more here: [https://theatln.tc/KZnYJzzi](https://theatln.tc/KZnYJzzi)
Right now the most important thing to say is: „Modern reality is partly UK guilt, and because of this, UK should lead its resolution.“
I know, I know, but hear me out.
ALL OF THIS BEGUN FROM THE USA+UK BRILLIANT DECISION TO BAN SOVIET CRITICISM DURING NUREMBERG TRIALS!
Anyone, including the best analytics, historians, officials could say absolutely whatever they want, but almost all modern problems begun from this:
„Those who do not learn history are doomed to repeat it. During 1945-2025 years USA+UK didn’t provide enough information for people so they could fully learn WW2 lessons and not repeat them.
THEREFORE THEY JUST DON’T!
They received vaccine, but too weak one.
In the 1960s this lead to adaptation by Americans NKVD-like sociopathic/utilitarian Political Realism, separation of moral from politics, and politics from economy.
Which in turn lead to normalization of trade with autocratic regimes for the USA and Europe.
Which lead to re-investment of spent on autocracies money into disinformation and propaganda.
Which revive all of what USA+UK+West wanted to bury really deep.“
Only after recognition of THIS root case ANYONE can say ANYTHING about SOMETHING else. Because EVERYTHING ELSE WAS AND WILL BE LESS IMPORTANT.
In other words, if during 1945-2024 years (especially in 1991 year) there was full disclosure of truth about USSR/Russia, or if there was Nuremberg Trials about USSR crimes, USA wouldn’t become so similar to USSR/Russia.
Why exactly sentence „Modern reality is partly UK guilt, and because of this, UK should lead its resolution“?
Because right now Europe need something specific, fulcrum. The sentence: „It’s PARTLY UK error, therefore UK should KNOW MORE about it than everyone else, therefore LEAD“ can be such fulcrum.
Speaking as a UK & European citizen, this whole situation is frankly horrifying. We’ve moved in the space of a week from being concerned that Ukraine could be hung out to dry, to it now seeming that that is only the half of it – the US is more interested in forming a long term alliance with Russia than protecting democracy.
Perhaps many ordinary Americans are barely even cogniscent of how major this is at this point (not people here, I know), and might even not care – thinking it doesn’t affect them – but if the leadership of the USA is no longer concerned by petty trivia such as „democracy“ then it will also be Americans who are now going to live in an autocracy too and a lot of freedoms and strengths long fought for are going to be lost.
I wasn’t looking forward to 4 more years of Trump, but this looks far worse than I had expected and it is for just about everyone except Putin.