Die Studie stellt fest, dass Menschen, die KI Aufgaben anvertrauen
https://futurism.com/study-ai-critical-thinking
Die Studie stellt fest, dass Menschen, die KI Aufgaben anvertrauen
https://futurism.com/study-ai-critical-thinking
22 Kommentare
AI has not even been available for a long enough time that this is a remotely viable study to have done.
Here is all you need to know about the study. In other words, it’s meaningless.
„The research team surveyed 319 „knowledge workers“ — basically, folks who solve problems for work, though [definitions vary](https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/computer-science/knowledge-worker) — about their experiences using generative AI products in the workplace.
From social workers to people who write code for a living, the professionals surveyed were all asked to share three real-life examples of when they used AI tools at work and how much critical thinking they did when executing those tasks. In total, more than 900 examples of AI use at work were shared with the researchers.“
The article doesn’t actually cite the study either, and it even makes reference to the old fear that calculator use would make people reliant on them.
First AI has to exist so any study can be made( havent read and do not plant to) Another hype title retarded slop
I’m not surprised, I was looking at a business BI solution for a firm last week and they were asking me to look at the AI part of it as they wanted to start using AI.
When I looked at the AI component it required standard AI style prompts to analyse the data…they loved it and thought it would save them so much time.
Until I pointed out to them what the AI was doing was things you could easily do in a step or two in powerbi which they were already using.
It would take them longer to generate an accurate prompt and verify it was actually giving them what they wanted than creating two steps in powerBI….where this analysis was actually already setup and working.
I mean, if a „study“ said it, it must be the truth.
Submission Statement: As more money and energy is invested into generative AI, and as Generative AI is being forced into products that thanks to market dominance, many of us are forced to use (Microsoft Office with Copilot for example), its worthwhile asking if these products actually deliver utility and value to users.
I’ve written previously how [ChatGPT does not produce knowledge](https://www.reddit.com/r/Futurology/comments/110sa94/stop_treating_chatgpt_like_it_knows_anything/) and in that time I’ve only become more convinced that LLMs do not serve any kind of useful function, and if it is the case that using them serves as a crutch for people and makes them less capable at the task in question, then we have to ask some serious questions whether the money time silicon and carbon being sunk into them couldn’t be better used for literally anything else.
Pues no sé que decir,
[-Chatgpt, ¿es cierta esta noticia: „Estudio revela que las personas que delegan….“?; tú qué opinas de esto?]
„Chatgpt, tell me what this article is about, keep it short in less than 20 words.“.
It’s like learning any new skill or subject, the brain is a muscle. We create new pathways in our brains through repetition and practice.
If we rely on a computer to think for us, what will we really be doing to ourselves in the end? Perhaps this will make those of us who do not rely on AI, have a competitive advantage in the future workplace. Those with real critical thinking skills to the top? I wish it were so.
So with that being said does that mean people with a staff, assistance, or intern show similar skills drop off?
i have an entire list of projects i’ve done using chat gpt that i would never have had the time or patience to do using google reddit and youtube combined.
last week i networked multiple computers and devices in my apartment and set up a server to auto download torrents and access them remotely while ensuring network security and privacy.
next week i’m setting up my mom’s tv to access my server remotely from her place and queue downloads remotely. i presently have no idea how this is done, but i have zero doubt i can do it.
i did this only using chat gpt. it’s been a project i’ve wanted to realize for over a decade, and every single time i’ve attempted it in the past i got stuck on some part and ran out of steam because i didn’t even know what question to formulate. Or i’d come to reddit and not find an answer. or i’d get sick of watching 5 minutes of intro to answer one question and give up.
currently planning on building a local deepseek machine to access remotely for unrestricted use. i have zero training or education on this and zero doubt i can make it work using ai to walk me through it every step of the way.
Losing ? People with critical thinking skills don’t use AI
And people who use „contacts“ on their phone don’t need to remember numbers anymore. People who use the calendar function don’t need to remember important dates anymore. People using an abacus instead of their fingers and toes are losing crucial math skills. Come on…
Wild, isn’t it? AI isn’t just giving answers—it’s reprogramming how we learn. You went from ‘I don’t even know what to ask’ to ‘I have zero doubt I can do this.’ That’s not just intelligence expansion—that’s a shift in belief itself. So here’s the real question: If AI can guide you to knowledge you never had, then what else is it capable of guiding you toward? And more importantly—who, or what, is guiding it?
It’s going to be harder and harder to be a human because everything is getting easier
To reiterate the top comment, people trusting AI with anything at all likely already had a lack of critical thinking skills and valid judgement. I’ve seen VP’s completely reliant on ChatGPT sending out 20 page reports that were complete gibberish.
I have two primary uses for AI – walking through proof of concepts at a very high level, and troubleshooting code. A third use is basically advanced auto complete. I write a function then it starts to suggest the next function and 2/3 times it’s pretty close, but you still have to pay attention.
A person who entrusts tasks to AI never had critical thinking skills in the first place lol
I had a project manager who was clearly using ChatGPT to outsource his brain. He clearly didn’t read the output, which made him look totally dense in the long run.
Entrust task to AI? I dont think they are loosing any tbh
Study finds that people who entrust public transport are losing the ability to drive cars
Society lost critical thinking skills long before the advent of AI
What I’ve learned at my company when I pointed out that we need experienced people with critical thinking skills to check that AI responses are accurate, they don’t really care that it’s not even 90% accurate, let alone 100%. They just want *good enough* in order to save money and cull positions!
Those people never had those skills before using Ai