Warum sollte sich die USA mit Russland, Indien und China aufstellen und die EU oder die NATO hinter sich lassen? Warum sollte ihr Militär zustimmen?
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/zelenskiy-expected-meet-vance-munich-security-conference-begins-2025-02-14/
11 Kommentare
If the US has been taken over by obvious Russian assets, one might expect this to happen.
Because Russia and China have been trying to foment a populist movement in the US (demonstrably) for the last 20 years in order to strengthen their geopolitical stations as the US pulls back. You can trace this current MAGA populist movement back to the tea party of the 2000s, and now that its in power the goals are decreased globalization, focusing inward, and stepping down as the hegemonic police force. Unfortunately multipolarity of military and economic power has only ever led to war, so we will see if this trend continues both politically and militarily
I don’t know which world you live in but the one I am in, Trump is attacking everyone. This obviously benefits US’s adversaries more as they expected hard stance against them anyways.
I don’t see him siding with any country which doesn’t benefit him personally.
Because Putin has blackmail on him. Right Wingers (including JD Vance) in America are trying to spin this into some “new alliance” to wind down China.
Getting in bed with Russia to oppose China is comical. You are shutting door on NATO allies more than slamming the door in China’s face.
It gives China a path into fomenting a more cordial bond with the West because the Western World’s powerhouse abandoned them.
India and Israel have always been sort of neutral actors. They are close with the Western World and China+Russia.
Seems like they now prefer a geopolitical environment similar to pre WW1 when it was empires dividing the world amongst each other rather than treating smaller countries like equal partners.
Maybe NATO and EU have taken advantage of US for years and they are just resetting the equilibrium…
Perhaps it isn’t? Perhaps the Reuters shouldn’t spread misinformation?
NATO has been carried on a spending basis by the United States for decades. The Atlantic relationship rests on a foundation created at the end of world war two, that doesn’t necessarily make sense today. Europe is rich and rebuilt, they should be equal partners in security, particularly in their own backyard. How much aid would the United States get from Europe for a war against Mexico? Wouldn’t the Europeans not contribute a thing, or only token measures? Why does the USA have to do the heavy lifting in Europe? That’s the question that has to be raised. Like it or not the USA isn’t in a position to keep spending on everyone else’s behalf forever.
The world where the strong is respected and the weak is left behind when the going gets tough.
Actually from India’s perspective, I still don’t know what we’re gaining to he grouped with Russia and China.
F35s is nice but I think they are going to be expensive if we want a squadron or more. The indigenous AMCA remains the solution. India knows it well. And I don’t think Trump is offering tech transfer.
Tariff threat remains as it was.
Illegals Indians are being deported (probably rightly so).
Bangladesh was a low blow by Biden. They were getting close to Pakistan. Which means things were going to start blowing up in India soon. India would have retaliated harshly. So the US diffused the tension of their own causing.
Russia India. Nothing good or bad happened.
China India. Nothing in India’s favor by the US. Nothing against.
Trade deal between US-India. Uncertain.
Biden’s transfer for critical tech. Not sure. Might be paused.
Khalistan. US says it will protect its citizens.
These are pretty early days so no blame to the US for trying to protect it’s interests. I think that’s the reality of democracies.
Still trying to understand what India is gaining here to be grouped with Russia which probably gains in Ukraine and China which still enjoys a stupendous surplus.
Disagree with the article.
The United States since Obama has desired that Europe pickup the tab on European defense & allow us to pivot to Asia.
This isn’t new. The only thing new is the bluntness. We started telling you this during Obama’s term, it’s not new, it’s foreign policy strategy.