John Mearsheimer ist offensiver Realist, wen sollte ich lesen oder beobachten, um seinen Punkten entgegenzuwirken
John Mearsheimer ist offensiver Realist, wen sollte ich lesen oder beobachten, um seinen Punkten entgegenzuwirken
12 Kommentare
There is no countering his points, because he is right. All of his predictions since 2014 have been proven correct
Well when it comes to his Ukraine takes you could literally read Wikipedia and come up with a better analyst than he does.
probably liberal internationalism?
Robert Jervis
Specifically „perception and misperception in international politics“
I also like the article “ Let Us Now Praise Great Men: Bringing the Statesman Back In“
Daniel L. Byman and Kenneth M. Pollack
It’s good overview or big picture of why realism doesn’t always provide the whole picture.
I think mearsheimers argument that NATO is to blame for Ukraine is good example of where realism breaks down, in my opinion behavioral analysis of Putin as a singular leader and the historical and cultural situation of Russia is more relevant than real power politics
[This is the best repudiation of his perspective on Ukraine I’ve seen.](https://youtu.be/2a7CDKqWcZ0?si=n7Dhuc7PlL3IHVp4)
If you want to counter something you have to first know what it is. I wouldn’t take panning of him by others as his arguments. Which of his writings are you interested in countering?
I personally am not a fan of his work and I can confidently say that his opinions on Russia especially regarding Ukraine are factually incorrect.
I would recommend Bruno macras instead.
The Ukraine analysis would hold true but there are examples without NATO aggression.
Saying NATO push was a factor is valid as long as you also include Russian imperialism as the main reason. Putin wanted Ukraine to be under his influence and even a neutral Ukraine was not acceptable. His rhetoric itself disproves NATO was the main reason.
I wouldnt recommend reading just to counter a point of view. Get a feel of the IR landscape, its a spectrum of views, and understand where Mearsheimer fits in.
For classical realism Waltz is a good start. For Liberlism, start at Kant.
Grotius is the first that comes to mind. If we can develop society from a state of nature, why not world government from a state of geopolitical anarchy?
Go and search for Nato, Russia, Philosophy and John mearshiemer by armchair violence. This guy will explain everything about counter point of john mearshiemer.
The news.