Share.

    22 Kommentare

    1. cannot_walk_barefoot on

      If this thing hit the ocean, how big of a tsunami risk would there be if any? Let’s say it’s it’s in the middle of the Pacific and also one a few hundred miles from a shoreline 

    2. 2legit2lurk on

      How can we fast track this? What if instead of diverting the asteroid by crashing a probe into it, we gave it a little push?

    3. I’ve trained for this. I am prepared to execute multiple missions to eliminate this threat.

    4. We know. It’s been posted here 100 different ways. Same lame comments about people wanting it hit, too. Social media truly is making people dumber.

    5. If you stop tracking it, it’s not really there

      Also…please slam**DIRECTLY** into my house

    6. Can’t we just pull some renegade hotshots off their oil rig, toss them on a rocket and send them out after it?

    7. unexpectedDiogenes on

      One percent chance is scary stuff, I don’t think we can comprehend the risk because I’m afraid our brains just say “99% chance of not happening, moving on…” (edit: 1.6% chance from the article)

    8. Wandering_Dirtbag on

      I cant wait another seven years. Can we push that timeline up to the next few weeks?

    9. If Trump is still president by 2032 then that asteroid is going to be told to go back to its country and unable to enter without proper documentation.

    10. WittyPipe69 on

      Before today, I read soemthing saying the percentage was below 1%. Now it’s almost 2% chance? Lol that’s awesome.

    11. Nyxia-ezlyn on

      Yay, the ending we were waiting for. I hope it reaches us faster before we get ruined by the current drama led by capitalism and politics!

    12. We need to test out another asteroid collider. The last one worked well and we could use this asteroid to fine tune the procedure. A single data point can be misleading.

    Leave A Reply