In der Reihenfolge vom geringsten bis zum meisten Humanoiden haben Sie Gray Goo => abstrakter Industrieroboter => nicht-humanoider Roboter oder Fahrzeug (denken Sie an Wall-E und die meisten Star Wars-Droiden) => gepanzerter oder stilisierter Humanoid/Mech (denken Sie an Optimus Prime, C -3PO, [and almost all of NVidia’s humanoids](https://newatlas.com/robotics/nvidia-humanoid-robot-project-gr00t/)) => teilweise organisch aussehender humanoider Roboter (denken Sie an Sophia aus Saudi-Arabien und die meisten Animatroniker) => nicht zu unterscheidender menschlicher Roboter (denken Sie an den Terminator (ohne Kampfschaden und Detroit Become Human) In einer klassischen Uncanny-Valley-Situation (z. B. Animation) wären die gruseligsten Roboter jene etwa auf Sophias Niveau, die viele menschliche Züge haben, von einem relativ vorsichtigen Betrachter aber dennoch als nicht-menschlich erkannt werden können Beobachter. Ich glaube nicht, dass das bei Robotern, die in der realen Welt aktiv als Menschen durchgehen können (im Gegensatz zu völlig fiktiven Charakteren), so gut funktioniert, und wenn überhaupt, wird es zu erhöhtem Misstrauen gegenüber Robotern und Menschen führen, wenn es unmöglich ist, es ihnen zu sagen auseinander ohne Operation. Wurde dies überhaupt in Studien oder Romanen untersucht? Unheimliches Tal oder unheimliche Klippe?

    https://old.reddit.com/r/Futurology/comments/1c3xnjw/i_dont_think_theres_an_uncanny_valley_for_robots/

    Share.

    8 Kommentare

    1. noonemustknowmysecre on

      Dude, the upswing happens when you can’t tell it’s a bot. 

      Considering the weirder humans fall into the valley, I’m pretty confident that, yes, it dips down and comes back up.

    2. imho we need more social study on how people perceive humanoid robot compared to human, how much empathy they feel for them and more important how much interacting with robot will positively or negatively impact human-human interaction

      if the human is fully concious it’s a non-sentient puppet, being polite or respectfull might loss it’s sense but if human constantly interact with robot they might start to become more aggressive with human as well and how we reduce those effects, does having a C3-PO robot would make human interaction more important/relevant, does making them the most human-like in their interaction and look trick your empathy into treating them as human? would you feel more attached to your companionship robot if it look like a robot and not an human?

      there a lot of questions without answers and we will only start getting them when we manage to have smarter bot allowing human-level interaction

    3. oneeyedziggy on

      If it’s sufficiently humanlike, then it’s by definition not in the uncanny valley… Uncanny valley is when it’s approaching human-like enough that your brain starts evaluating it with much more rigorous criteria it uses for other humans but falls short… So, yea, if it’s sufficiently human-like it doesn’t fall short…

    4. InternecivusRaptus on

      There is UK series [Humans][1], that shows human-like robots called synths. They’re indistinguishable from humans (well, duh, they’re played by human actors), but there’s still this uncanny valley in the way they move (actors playing synths took extra choreography classes to remove „humanity“ from their movements, and IMO it paid off). It also explores the mistrust you mentioned, so I really recommend to watch it if you’re interested in such themes.

      1: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humans_(TV_series)

    5. I don’t really understand what your question is. But there definitely is an uncanny valley. Sophia doesn’t look convincing enough. I work in a museum and we had an Ameca from the UK. That thing is creepy af. The grey skin ones are actually a feature, it looks way less weird with grey skin. Interacting with it is like one of those flip images that change when you angle them differently. The sensation of seeing a human/living thing fades in and out. It’s not very consistent yet. The valley is steep enough to see all 3 aspects.

    6. Interesting-Ad-889 on

      i think the movements and the social aspects or it like voice naturality , the eyes, the fluidity of the android influences on how uncanny it is. for example ameca. ameca is not nearly as scary as the polar express or early sophia. she kinda awakes a feeling of symphathy because she looks like a living being so much because of those.. movements when looking around, maybe its because ameca does not have skin that i dont have the uncanny valley as much? i still have some. about sophia.. well sophia fucking scares me. but today’s sophia is wayyy less scary than the original sophia. dear god. those lifeless eyes

    7. shadowscar248 on

      Like everything else that humans create, the sex bots will make it the norm and then we’ll develop regular household bots from there.

    8. Not_Legal_Advice_Pod on

      Humans are great at denying the humanity of other humans based on nothing more than what their favorite book in a three-part series is.  I’m genuinely afraid for our moral capacity when it comes to AI or aliens.

    Leave A Reply