Die Artemis-Architekturelemente von NASA.gov
https://i.redd.it/psav8xdq85be1.jpeg
Die Artemis-Architekturelemente von NASA.gov
https://i.redd.it/psav8xdq85be1.jpeg
6 Kommentare
This graphic is found on the Moon to Mars Architecture Components page at [https://www.nasa.gov/moontomarsarchitecture-components/](https://www.nasa.gov/moontomarsarchitecture-components/)
>Individual elements in the architecture are the systems and hardware that enable exploration. NASA maps elements to one or more sub-architectures and they may be used across multiple campaign segments.
>Some elements predate the architecture development effort (e.g., the Space Launch System and Orion spacecraft) and were mapped to the use cases and functions they already fulfill when this effort began. Other elements have arisen from capability gaps that were not fulfilled by existing elements.
>As the Moon to Mars Architecture progresses through the segments, NASA will instantiate more elements to increase the number of Moon to Mars Objectives that missions may accomplish.
Thank you. Way too many people think Artemis and associate it with a launch vehicle. It’s a Cislunar architecture, a system of integrated systems. Its contracted services and products, its federal laboratories, its NASA’s astronaut corps, its thousands of scientists at participating institutions- it’s more than a rocket.
Although I’m a space and science enthusiast, sending humans to the Moon (or Mars) seems like a huge waste of money and effort. Let’s send some AI-driven robots instead. Yes, it’s all very fine to hype up the romantic notion of ‘humans want to explore’, but at what cost?
As was the case in the 60s, sending humans to the moon is a political project, not a science nor engineering project – although these sectors will of course benefit tremendously in terms of money and employment, and such projects are an engineering marvel.
To be frank, I think if humans will land on the moon during the next decade, it will be a Chinese crew. But this is unfounded speculation, of course 😉
The main question is still there. Why?
HALO is not ESA it is NASA and contracted to northrop grumman
„Nice system… Would be a shame if someone took a Trump to it.“
Hey NASA? It’s Rube calling, Rube Goldsberg, I’d like my machine back. You over complicated it.