>Now, researchers at the University of Toronto, through innovative quantum experiments, say they have demonstrated that „negative time“ isn’t just a theoretical idea—it exists in a tangible, physical sense, deserving closer scrutiny.
>The findings, [posted](https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.03680) on the preprint server *arXiv* but not yet published in a peer-reviewed journal, have attracted both global attention and skepticism.
>The researchers emphasize that these perplexing results highlight a peculiar quirk of [quantum mechanics](https://phys.org/tags/quantum+mechanics/) rather than a radical shift in our understanding of time.
Otherwise-4PM on
I am curious about peer review. Unfortunately, a lot of findings like this are a cry for help due to the terrible model of financing science. Very often, it is an attempt to prove their own research valid in order to continue receiving support.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
2 Kommentare
From the article
>Now, researchers at the University of Toronto, through innovative quantum experiments, say they have demonstrated that „negative time“ isn’t just a theoretical idea—it exists in a tangible, physical sense, deserving closer scrutiny.
>The findings, [posted](https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.03680) on the preprint server *arXiv* but not yet published in a peer-reviewed journal, have attracted both global attention and skepticism.
>The researchers emphasize that these perplexing results highlight a peculiar quirk of [quantum mechanics](https://phys.org/tags/quantum+mechanics/) rather than a radical shift in our understanding of time.
I am curious about peer review. Unfortunately, a lot of findings like this are a cry for help due to the terrible model of financing science. Very often, it is an attempt to prove their own research valid in order to continue receiving support.