Water is extremely heavy and thus expensive to transport. Thus it is vastly better to make locally, on the moon. Imagine sending water resupply mission every few weeks to a small base. A giant rocket with just water, nothing else. Falcon heavy can take… what, 20 something tons? That’s 20 something cubic meters of water. A single small swimming pool. For $90 million. And that’s the cheap option.
Constant-Lychee9816 on
„We need laws now because we won’t be able to do it before them“
TheProteinSnack on
The article has nothing to do with moon law, or about mining for water on the moon. The article is about Chinese scientists looking at ways of synthesizing water with hydrogen and oxygen on the moon.
Also, if it were NASA doing it, I don’t think we’d hear alarmist concerns for a need for international law on the matter.
thiosk on
The space marines are gonna make the law on the moon
Drewid36 on
China wouldn’t listen to any laws if they exist, see south china sea, currency manipulation in wto, etc.
AllKnighter5 on
Serious question. If we go to the moon, use all the surface material (moon rocks) and science them to make water, does the moon change in weight? Would it impact the tides? Or if they made it water, drank it, peed it on the moon, it would all be the exact same?
ihavenoidea12345678 on
I bet the moon will eventually be managed like the old west with people “staking a claim”, and claims only valid if the land is homesteaded or something similar.
Personnel override automated claims. That way no one can just land a 10km net and claim a whole mountain. You have to land people there to have your claim formally recognized by…. The UN?
I don’t really know, but I agree we need some kind of framework.
Nearby_Interaction69 on
I don’t hear people saying the same for the mars exploration and colonization plan.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
8 Kommentare
Water is extremely heavy and thus expensive to transport. Thus it is vastly better to make locally, on the moon. Imagine sending water resupply mission every few weeks to a small base. A giant rocket with just water, nothing else. Falcon heavy can take… what, 20 something tons? That’s 20 something cubic meters of water. A single small swimming pool. For $90 million. And that’s the cheap option.
„We need laws now because we won’t be able to do it before them“
The article has nothing to do with moon law, or about mining for water on the moon. The article is about Chinese scientists looking at ways of synthesizing water with hydrogen and oxygen on the moon.
Also, if it were NASA doing it, I don’t think we’d hear alarmist concerns for a need for international law on the matter.
The space marines are gonna make the law on the moon
China wouldn’t listen to any laws if they exist, see south china sea, currency manipulation in wto, etc.
Serious question. If we go to the moon, use all the surface material (moon rocks) and science them to make water, does the moon change in weight? Would it impact the tides? Or if they made it water, drank it, peed it on the moon, it would all be the exact same?
I bet the moon will eventually be managed like the old west with people “staking a claim”, and claims only valid if the land is homesteaded or something similar.
Personnel override automated claims. That way no one can just land a 10km net and claim a whole mountain. You have to land people there to have your claim formally recognized by…. The UN?
I don’t really know, but I agree we need some kind of framework.
I don’t hear people saying the same for the mars exploration and colonization plan.