Share.

    5 Kommentare

    1. losviktsgodis on

      It’s going to become a ghost area and cost them way more than it benefits.

      Them putting all their eggs in one basket, which is ethnic cleansing for 30 years, is going to bite them in the ass one day.

    2. Ok_Connection7680 on

      This is what happens when you have pro-Russian degenerates in power, who pull the country into the abyss by unrestricted nationalism. Over the decades of our “independence” we completely ruined our military, economy, industry and et cetera under autocratic thugs, which is unaffordable in our case — we are not Azerbaijan with oil money and we don’t have a “brother” country that will bail us out just in case.

      As a result of these policies, we also lost a lot of people, who migrated out of corrupt misery Armenia was 6 years ago. To R*ssia.

    3. I’m reiterating again, you’re misusing „colonization“ and watering down it’s usefulness as a term. Colonization (in modern terms) implies capturing, settling, and extracting resources from a piece of territory. It usually involves expelling the natives. The difference in the case of Artsakh is the international community always viewed Artsakh as an entity within Azerbaijan; this has been a lawful fact whether we like it or not since the 90’s. Colonization implies, like in the case of Israel as a settler-colony, settling in an „uninhabited territory“. Everyone on all sides knows that wasn’t the case with Artsakh (nor was it in Palestine either, but you get the point).

      You want to call it an ethno-nationalist variant of fascism? Great, it would be more appropriate. But „colonization“ is not exactly a useful term to describe what is happening in Artsakh.

    Leave A Reply