Share.

    8 Kommentare

    1. justanotheridiot1031 on

      I mean after they declined to Prosecute Biden for committing the same crime this was pretty much the only option.

    2. hamsterfolly on

      This will be appealed and overturned just like her “special master” idea.

      Special Counsel appointments have been upheld in past cases.

    3. „The Superseding Indictment is DISMISSED because Special Counsel Smith’s appointment violates the Appointments Clause of the United States Constitution,“ she wrote.

      Cannon wrote that Smith’s appointment was unconstitutional because it „effectively usurps“ the authority of Congress.

      I don’t understand the reasoning given. Can someone tell me in ordinary language why she did this?

    Leave A Reply