Durchgesickertes Memo behauptet, die New York Times habe Künstler entlassen, um sie durch KI zu ersetzen
https://futurism.com/the-byte/new-york-times-fires-artists-ai-memo
Durchgesickertes Memo behauptet, die New York Times habe Künstler entlassen, um sie durch KI zu ersetzen
https://futurism.com/the-byte/new-york-times-fires-artists-ai-memo
11 Kommentare
Submission statement: how do we get a sense of job loss numbers caused by AI if most of the time, the corporations have reasons to keep it hushed up?
What about the jobs that never were had in the first place because somebody just used an AI to do it instead of hiring somebody?
Will AI create new and better jobs, or will AI just do those jobs too?
Is this like industrialization in the 1700s or is it like horses being virtually entirely replaced by cars?
AI will be the fast food option for everything. Quality will go to shit, but man it’s cheap!
They are going to just capitalize on this until it’s made illegal.
This is not AI art this is fucking thievery at an unprecedented level.
The AI doesn’t make shit it just steals. This is an incredible loophole in our rights that doesn’t matter because IP and art rights only apply to the rich.
When AI can incept art instead of simply copy from the Internet we can talk but it’s too busy just splicing stock photos and other people’s work.
This is just a historical moment of high crime that nobody gives a shit about now because „those people“ don’t matter.
If tech Valley wants to claim all art is thievery by all means depower every major company and every IP right in the country. The thing we are built on. Then hit the science and tech communities with invention and patents as just stealing the concepts of others.
Where does it stop? Do we dismantle the problem or do we just give rights only to the wealthy?
AI fatigue is going to be very real very soon unless AI art changes in aesthetic. People who know what to look for are tired of it already.
They are also suing OpenAI for copyright infringement and have asked the court to order the destruction of the model! And now they are firing artists and using it. Hilarious! Guess that lawsuit’s dead in the water.
Imagine still complaining about the inevitability of AI. You guys all jump in these threads every time they are posted and start shitting yourselves about something that won’t change. It’s honestly hilarious at this point.
My company did it. Downsized artists and copywriters when the salespeople decided they’d do bad work with ai instead of using the professionals the clients are actually paying for.
This is gonna end like self checkout lanes. They’ll be installed, and then promptly removed.
Or, a better analogy may be prepared TV dinner style food. In the 50s people thought it would replace all cooking and chefs would vanish. Many restaurants started serving frozen crap. The quality was awful and people flocked to restaurants that served fresh food instead.
Also, this is just an unconfirmed story as of now.
Unfettered capitalism is what this is. We all saw it coming, we all did what we have been conditioned to do, nothing.
Oh, well, we have been complaining about it on social media, myself currently included, but what beyond that can we actually do? The politicians side with the money, they’ll get jobs with the companies they favor, or are investing in them already.
The writing has always been on the wall, if corporations can make decisions that increase profit, they’ll make those decisions, no matter the cost.
And, the cost is usually the rest of us. Sacrificial lambs to the capitalism god…
But AI art sucks. Random unexplainable artefacts plague the images. Do people not realise that. Are people higher up that far removed from reality?
When the rich have all the money, it will trickle down to us.
Reagan said so.