Share.

    33 Kommentare

    1. Headlines like these are just so bonkers man.

      “Hitler Invades Poland. Here’s Why That’s a Big Deal”

      I know vernacular evolves, but casual clickbaity language for this stuff is just wild

    2. ToddBradley on

      Just notify me when the Secretary of the Air Force makes a surprise announcement that the Commander In Chief has been launched into space to operate the weapons.

    3. Weaponization of space is imo inevitable; the military has had stuff up there basically for as long as we’ve been able to put stuff up there, and when a military has valuable stuff, other militaries want to be able to break it, which necessitates being able to defend it, which necessitates needing to be able to get past the defenses, so on and so forth… It’s distasteful, personally, and the idea of space-to-surface weapons is lowkey terrifying, but having capability up there is attractive to military planners

    4. ImperatorScientia on

      Clickbait, sensationalist headline with obvious intention to induce an irrational response…nope. : )

    5. FlexFanatic on

      Didn’t we have weapon in space in the 80’s. What was the Star Wars program?

    6. TheReal_WadeWilson on

      I did a stint for the Navy as an intelligence analyst. If anyone believes the US (or any major power) is just now putting weapons into space, they’re extremely naive.

    7. I feel like our weapons in space is just our ability to scuttle deprecated satellites into inconvenient orbits used by our enemies. This administration has ‚mutual destruction‘ vibes.

    8. The_Southern_Sir on

      Anyone that thought we spent all that money in the 80s and didn’t was deluding themselves. Not to mention every navy ship and most around based missile launchers can launch anti-satellite missiles.

    9. Mind you China and Russia have had weapons (and allegedly already tested them in orbit) for years now. 

      China outright said they have a satellite killer up there. Russia used a defunct one to target a US comms satellite in 2009 (but said they didn’t and totally wouldn’t lie about it even though it was very obvious from the trajectory)

      Objectively good thing for deterrence. Otherwise other countries can just turn off your Internet or communications if they decide they wanna get froggy

    10. StrangeInsanity on

      Isn’t there an unspoken truth that if a country has space programs with Satellite and ICBM launch capabilities, it is safe to assume that they have weapons in space?

    11. 2_SANE_4_SANITY on

      The Outer Space Treaty only forbids nuclear and other WMD’s from going into space.
      There is nothing illegal about conventional weapons in space. Every Soyuz crew capsule that docks with the International Space Station has a handgun stored onboard.

    12. Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I’ve seen in this thread:

      |Fewer Letters|More Letters|
      |——-|———|—|
      |[ASAT](/r/Space/comments/1whbec6/stub/pa1qzvw „Last usage“)|[Anti-Satellite weapon](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-satellite_weapon)|
      |[DoD](/r/Space/comments/1whbec6/stub/pa1h479 „Last usage“)|US Department of Defense|
      |[ICBM](/r/Space/comments/1whbec6/stub/pa1tass „Last usage“)|Intercontinental Ballistic Missile|
      |[LEO](/r/Space/comments/1whbec6/stub/pa1tass „Last usage“)|Low Earth Orbit (180-2000km)|
      | |Law Enforcement Officer (most often mentioned during transport operations)|
      |[SLS](/r/Space/comments/1whbec6/stub/pa1p6ao „Last usage“)|Space Launch System heavy-lift|

      |Jargon|Definition|
      |——-|———|—|
      |[perigee](/r/Space/comments/1whbec6/stub/pa1jxmb „Last usage“)|Lowest point in an elliptical orbit around the Earth (when the orbiter is fastest)|

      Decronym is now also available on Lemmy! Requests for support and new installations should be directed to the Contact address below.

      —————-
      ^(6 acronyms in this thread; )[^(the most compressed thread commented on today)](/r/Space/comments/1wg9dsf)^( has 17 acronyms.)
      ^([Thread #12695 for this sub, first seen 15th Sep 2026, 21:36])
      ^[[FAQ]](http://decronym.xyz/) [^([Full list])](http://decronym.xyz/acronyms/Space) [^[Contact]](https://hachyderm.io/@Two9A) [^([Source code])](https://gistdotgithubdotcom/Two9A/1d976f9b7441694162c8)

    13. This is how far from the reality we try to paint we are in the US we’ve come. Spending the money to use space to point weapons down at the Earth to horde shit from others is peak greediness and avarice. People wonder if the ‚great filter‘ will be catastrophic attack from aliens or such. Nope. It’ll be this shit getting loose.

    14. Morning_Gecko24 on

      the scary part isnt just putting hardware up there, its the debris and escalation loop. even a non-destructive test can turn one orbit into years of tracking problems. curious if the article gets into verification rules or is it mostly about the announcement?

    15. As soon as the star wars program was canceled in 1993 in my mind was basically admitting they finished it. And they have weapons in space at that time. Pretty sure improvements have been made.

    16. Didn’t the soviets deploy and fire a cannon in space in the 70s? I think when they were deorbiting one of their stations

    17. is the source someone competent or just another brag-ramble from the demented orange?

    Leave A Reply