Close Menu
    Erweiterte Aufnahmen des FPV-Drohnenangriffs der PDF-Rebellen auf Jets der myanmarischen (burmesischen) Luftwaffe in Tada-U, Region Mandalay (10. September)
    Konflikt

    Erweiterte Aufnahmen des FPV-Drohnenangriffs der PDF-Rebellen auf Jets der myanmarischen (burmesischen) Luftwaffe in Tada-U, Region Mandalay (10. September)

    Share.
    View 13 Comments

    13 Kommentare

    1. Mikhiel_Thorsson on

      Man why do they look like they all should be in the third grade classes of elementary school

    3. TriggerPuller9000 on

      All that prep, and they flew drones into empty space, a roof, and maybe a jet.

    4. Comfortable_Butts on

      I know we’re definitely spoiled for good footage from Ukraine, but man these guys seem super inexperienced. Hitting the same net covered hanger three times in a row?

    5. bleeh805 on

      I may be wrong but years ago these guys were fighting in plain clothes and flip flops. They have come a very long way.

    8. Vogel-Kerl on

      Other countries‘ militaries are learning quickly:

      Smaller, inexpensive drones, in large numbers, can be an effective game-changer on the battlefield and behind enemy lines.

      While the large, multimillion dollar drones that the US uses have their place for reconnaissance and long-range attacks; there is clearly a role for smaller, inexpensive drones. Ukraine has proven this in the last few years, we’ve also seen that defending against these smaller drones is difficult.

      Every threat that a WWII or Vietnam soldier had to worry about are still there: tanks, artillery, mines, booby traps, bullets, etc…, but now we have to add small military drones to that list.

      Modern, smaller drones provide: reconnaissance, adjust artillery fire, bombing functions, FPV/kamikaze attacks and many other functions.

      There are sea based drones attacking boats & ships, there are ground drones that lay land mines, deliver supplies and even evacuate casualties.

      I hope that the militaries of larger countries are paying attention. For the cost of one RQ-4 Global Hawk (>$150M), a military could build thirty-thousand, $5000 drones.I hope NATO troops are training in the various uses of drones as well as training to determine the best defences against drones. Their militaries **will** face drone warfare in the future.

    9. Vogel-Kerl on

      Other countries‘ militaries are learning quickly:

      Smaller, inexpensive drones, in large numbers, can be an effective game-changer on the battlefield and behind enemy lines.

      While the large, multimillion dollar drones that the US uses have their place for reconnaissance and long-range attacks; there is clearly a role for smaller, inexpensive drones. Ukraine has proven this in the last few years, we’ve also seen that defending against these smaller drones is difficult.

      Every threat that a WWII or Vietnam soldier had to worry about are still there: tanks, artillery, mines, booby traps, bullets, etc…, but now we have to add small military drones to that list.

      Modern, smaller drones provide: reconnaissance, adjust artillery fire, bombing functions, FPV/kamikaze attacks and many other functions.

      There are sea based drones attacking boats & ships, there are ground drones that lay land mines, deliver supplies and even evacuate casualties.

      I hope that the militaries of larger countries are paying attention. For the cost of one RQ-4 Global Hawk (>$150M), a military could build thirty-thousand, $5000 drones.I hope NATO troops are training in the various uses of drones as well as training to determine the best defences against drones. Their militaries **will** face drone warfare in the future.

    Leave A Reply