Share.

    37 Kommentare

    1. PlsSuckMyToes on

      The Supreme Court’s logic here is „yeah they are holding a gun to your head but we cant actually do anything yet cuz they havnt actually pulled the trigger“. Ridiculous

    2. Eastern_Bet678 on

      The proper time is after the election and harm happens.

      This won’t be messy at all.

    3. “Federal courts review final rules, not proposed rules—and certainly not antecedent internal directives to propose a rule. If the Postal Service’s final rule harms the States, they may challenge that rule”

      The USPS literally said once the injunction was lifted they were moving immediately ahead with enforcement plans of denying delivery of mail in ballots to states that havent provided voter rolls to the Government you gotta be fucking joking

    4. SCOTUS is as crooked as Trump is. John Robert’s court will go down in history as one that destroyed democracy and forever changed America for the worst.

    5. They just invent justifications to do give the executive whatever it wants. This „court“ is laughably corrupt. They’re lawless.

    6. Republican judges only care about enforcing standing when it was beneficial to them.

      we had them saying people in Florida couldn’t sue over the „don’t say gay‘ bill until they could bring an instance of it directly harming them.

      Meanwhile we had them hear A case from a Colorado baker who didn’t want to be forced to make A cake for a gay customer, when he had NEVER had a gay customer try to purchase A cake with a “ gay“ message on it.

      The federal government telling states how they can conduct elections should have been a slam drunk „Well the Constitution grants states the power to determine how elections are held, the locale, and manner of election“

    7. PDXGuy33333 on

      With the USPS rules set to take effect on 8/26 one can hope that Judge Talwani to promptly enjoin their enforcement. I hope that will get around the „too soon“ argument. Fingers crossed.

      I am a lawyer beginning to doubt the legitimacy of this Supreme Court.

    8. *“So um yea, you’ll just have to wait till they steal the elections, keep power and enjoy it while you spend years litigating EVERY election they won over rules they put in place for themselves to win said elections. Tee Hee! Might as well let them stay in office because by the time you figure it out, the next elections willuh be comin around Heh Heh!. Ain’t we neat!“.*

    9. Mr_Tort_Feasor on

      I wonder when Roberts and crew are moving onto the military base with the rest of Trump’s cabinet members.

    10. Ok people. Make a voting plan to go in person if possible, and bring a friend.
      Don’t let the fascists win. The fascists hate it when people vote.
      And to people who play the ‘both sides’ excuse, sit down and shut up. One side is yes far worse.

    11. TheRealBlueJade on

      This is not the action of a Supreme Court that believes the republicans will win in the midterms.
      They know the people are fed up with them, and yet they attempt to subvert the will of the people.

    12. ireaditonwikipedia on

      Hahaha this SCOTUS is corrupt and illegitimate.

      If we ever survive this nightmare (not guaranteed) this entire SCOTUS need to be impeached and removed. Roberts is a oligarch and GOP stooge.

    13. jocoquecousteau on

      Dismantle this court. Absolute corruption. Literally he got caught getting millions. They are a rubber stamp for a dictatorship.

    14. ReggieEvansTheKing on

      The correct response to this is a national strike on election day and every single person calling off of work to go vote instead.

    15. FLtoVT_For-A-Reason on

      Autocracy is here. SCOTUS is complicit. Congress is complicit. The pathway to saving America is becoming more and more narrow.

    16. CulturalKing5623 on

      My concern was this seemed inconsistent with SCOTUS’s ruling on Biden’s student loan forgiveness program, but apparently the states that sued to block it waited until the Department of Education had finalized their rules and laid out exactly how forgiveness would work and the states sued to block it based on concrete dollar amounts they faced losing.

      In this case we sued as soon as [Trump issued the EO](https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/03/2026-06601/ensuring-citizenship-verification-and-integrity-in-federal-elections) and it only directed „the Postmaster General is hereby directed to initiate a proposed rulemaking pursuant to [39 U.S.C. 401](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/39/401) and other applicable authority within 60 days of the date of this order.“

      So it seems the SCOTUS is saying you can’t block someone from considering a rule or starting the rule making process. It would be like if the GOP sued to block Biden’s [commission on SCOTUS reform](https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/final-report-the-presidential-commission-the-supreme-court-the-united-states) before it even made any recommendations.

      It’s all bullshit in the end, the way the SCOTUS has turned attacks on the fundamental voting rights of citizens into some game that can be procedurally won instead of a right that shall not be infringed is legitimately terrifying shit and reason number one we need to get rid of a standing SCOTUS once and for all, but this isn’t a case of them making shit up as they go like I thought.

      Sue the moment the rule is finalized and get an injunction ASAP, even though I’m sure SCOTUS will just say it’s too close to the election to do anything about it and let it pass. Then it’s up to us to decide how we respond to being rules by dictator and corrupt council of elders.

    17. imjustnotready on

      States: Hey our democracy is being threatened

      Supreme Court: no it isn’t.

    18. a_rabid_buffalo on

      What a bunch of fucking shit. Elections are held at a state level. USPS has already been told they cannot fuck with our elections. This ruling is just a way for them to let Trump keep doing what he wants without actually publicly saying he can do what he wants.

    19. After 4 justices were willing to rule against the constitution itself in the birthright citizenship case, this is entirely unsurprising. They have abandoned even a pretense of rational thought in their rulings.

    20. So we have to wait until they steal the election to raise an objection, but once they’ve stolen the election they can just do what they want and say tough shit, we’re elected now.

      Legally its like saying we have to let that known arsonist follow through with his stated goal of burning down the building, even though hes walking towards the building with gasoline and matches…

      „Well he hasnt started a fire so we just have to wait and see what he does….“

      This is asinine.

    21. This decision makes absolutely zero sense and contradicts what they have ruled in the past about other election matters.

    22. Watching a coup happen in real time in the United States is not exactly what I thought it would be.

    23. HighDrive2RightField on

      This is what happens when people have no fear of retribution.

      This is what happens when the government doesn’t function.

      Mango Dipshit probably funneling money to their offshore bank accounts. He is afraid of the accountability if democrats win big.

    24. iamliterallyonfire on

      Supreme Court is corrupt. Presidency is corrupt. Congress is corrupt.

    25. Urgent enough for Supreme Court to use emergency docket, yet not urgent enough to address the issue. Typical Roberts-era hypocrisy and partisanship

    26. DiagonalBike on

      Blue states should directly sue the Supreme Court for inconsistent rulings over the 10 years. Take it down to the Federal Courts and if the majority of Federal Courts rule in their favor ignore any ruling from the Supreme Court. The Trump administration is the best at ignoring court rulings. It’s time for the states to start copying that behavior.

    27. Particular_Ticket_20 on

      Im so tired of the scotus seeming to allow every loophole they come up with.

      Like „sorry folks, we have to ignore the fundamental language and intent of the law cause they found this one gray area clause that let’s us agree with him for now. You can get justice later“

    Leave A Reply