SpaceX erwägt nach glückverheißendem Ende des 13. Flugs den Tower-Catch für das nächste Raumschiff | SpaceX wird wahrscheinlich versuchen, Starship bei seinem nächsten Flug wieder an der Startrampe einzufangen.

    https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/07/spacex-eyes-tower-catch-for-next-starship-after-auspicious-end-to-13th-flight/

    Share.

    11 Kommentare

    1. >SpaceX was more than lucky Friday, sending its 13th full-scale Starship test flight halfway around the world from South Texas to an on-target, intact splashdown in a remote section of the Indian Ocean.

      >Starship has made precise splashdowns before. This time, however, the ship gently tipped over and came to rest floating in a remote stretch of ocean west of Australia. Previous splashdowns ended with conflagrations, an outcome SpaceX officials have come to expect with each water landing of Starship.

      >The buoyant Starship looked to be in fine shape after reaching the Indian Ocean. SpaceX engineers flew drones over the vehicle to inspect its heat shield, getting their best look yet at how more than 18,000 ceramic tiles insulating the ship’s stainless steel airframe weathered the trip to space and back. The tiles withstood temperatures up to 2,600° Fahrenheit (1,430° Celsius) as Starship streaked back into the atmosphere at the end of its hour-long flight from Starbase, Texas.

      >Encouraged by the picture-perfect end to Friday’s flight, SpaceX is likely to take the next leap with Starship on the next launch, according to the company’s founder and CEO, Elon Musk. That would entail hurling Starship on a longer-range trajectory, perhaps into low-Earth orbit, to bring the vehicle back to the launch site. Mechanical arms on the launch tower will attempt to capture the ship as it slows to a hover. SpaceX has already done this with the rocket’s massive Super Heavy booster, which is larger and heavier than Starship itself, but comes back at a fraction of the speed.

      >“Unless we discover problems after mission data review, SpaceX will attempt to catch the ship with the tower on next flight,” Musk wrote on X Friday evening.

    2. About time! Exciting times for spaceflight. Crazy there might be a v3 ship catch before a v3 booster.

    3. Did they switch to catching instead of landing, or is this just a temporary solution for testing?

    4. I have to say, and this is somewhat unrelated to this specific piece of news, but this sub in largely not spacex news constantly, yet all my main feed ever pulls from this sub is spacex news. Wish there was a way to reverse that. Kinda odd also, and admittedly a bit suspicious.

    5. Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I’ve seen in this thread:

      |Fewer Letters|More Letters|
      |——-|———|—|
      |[BO](/r/Space/comments/1v77pw6/stub/ozx51go „Last usage“)|Blue Origin (*Bezos Rocketry*)|
      |[FAA](/r/Space/comments/1v77pw6/stub/ozx7svs „Last usage“)|Federal Aviation Administration|
      |[LEO](/r/Space/comments/1v77pw6/stub/ozw71pm „Last usage“)|Low Earth Orbit (180-2000km)|
      | |Law Enforcement Officer (most often mentioned during transport operations)|
      |[NG](/r/Space/comments/1v77pw6/stub/ozwx4fb „Last usage“)|New Glenn, two/three-stage orbital vehicle by Blue Origin|
      | |Natural Gas (as opposed to pure methane)|
      | |Northrop Grumman, aerospace manufacturer|
      |[SN](/r/Space/comments/1v77pw6/stub/ozvzzff „Last usage“)|(Raptor/Starship) Serial Number|
      |[SRB](/r/Space/comments/1v77pw6/stub/ozwkf7j „Last usage“)|Solid Rocket Booster|
      |[ULA](/r/Space/comments/1v77pw6/stub/ozx51go „Last usage“)|United Launch Alliance (Lockheed/Boeing joint venture)|

      |Jargon|Definition|
      |——-|———|—|
      |[Raptor](/r/Space/comments/1v77pw6/stub/ozxal30 „Last usage“)|[Methane-fueled rocket engine](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raptor_(rocket_engine_family)) under development by SpaceX|

      Decronym is now also available on Lemmy! Requests for support and new installations should be directed to the Contact address below.

      —————-
      ^(8 acronyms in this thread; )[^(the most compressed thread commented on today)](/r/Space/comments/1v5sr7h)^( has 33 acronyms.)
      ^([Thread #12596 for this sub, first seen 26th Jul 2026, 17:06])
      ^[[FAQ]](http://decronym.xyz/) [^([Full list])](http://decronym.xyz/acronyms/Space) [^[Contact]](https://hachyderm.io/@Two9A) [^([Source code])](https://gistdotgithubdotcom/Two9A/1d976f9b7441694162c8)

    6. I don’t really know much about the FAA or regulation in general, but do we already know if they flight plan will be approved ?
      I say this because the reentry trajectory has to be above land before reaching the landing site. I wonder how the risk is assessed.

    7. Where is starship now? Did they sink it? I haven’t seen confirmation either way.

    8. Hypothesis_Null on

      Clearly they should give up on the chopsticks and just catch Starship with a giant ramen bowl filled with pool noodles to cushion the fall.

    9. I’m quite curious what is causing booster v3 so many issues witb relight, when the v3 ship has be3n performing basically perfectly

    Leave A Reply