Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang used his first-ever post on X to back a growing industry campaign in support of open-weight artificial intelligence models, joining more than 20 technology companies that argue new restrictions could hurt U.S. competitiveness instead of strengthening national security.
AlteredEinst on
And that’s bad why? Because it makes nvidia less money?
What a shame.
SirEsquireGoatThe3rd on
AI restrictions happen more in China than in the US. Mostly recently China has just banned parasocial relationships with AI’s, e.g no dating your chat bots.
Regulation will not be the death of AI innovation in the US, it will be the chaos that is free market developmental chaos that will hinder AI development. There is no centrally planned infrastructure improvements that will support the power needs of AI, in fact the costs are being pushed onto US consumers for competing with the same power supply. The power turbines needed to build new AI data centers are years behind schedule and will unlikely catch up to meet modern demand.
This video goes alot more into it if anyone is interested.
The cost is more of a factor then restrictions, imo.
Chinksta on
At this point, he can say anything because the AI bubble is reaching its climax and ready to pop anytime soon.
TemporalGrid on
If the call to pour everything into AI is because of national security to beat China or other rivals to the punch then we need an Apollo or Manhattan Project and let the government do it, not unreliable ultra rich assholes and multinational corporations.
SoCalThrowAway7 on
Why does the Epstein class think we give a shit if China beats us in the AI race? The results of that won’t affect what puts food on our table. I’m getting so sick of out of touch ghouls who own all the media trying to tell us how to feel tbh.
Careful_Picture7712 on
Trump policies are pushing all innovation toward China.
rickny0 on
If you have any doubt about China’s ability to surpass the US technically watch a video of the Shanghai Disney ride Pirates of the Caribbean. Seriously. Underwater pirate battles are mind blowing. China has creative and technical skills easily able to do anything we can do and it’s easy to imagine China replacing us on the world stage.
Fl1pSide208 on
I think it might be because China may want to actually innovate with AI and the like because unlike the US, China seems more interested in developing their nation long term. The US AI market is just that a market of snake oil and smoke focused on extracting wealth. The writing is on the wall for better or worse.
yijiujiu on
Not like they have a vested interest or anything, nooooo
FrostySnowJ on
Maybe he and all the other people pushing for more AI should be the ones living near the data centers
igoyard on
[ Removed by Reddit ]
ggouge on
This is basically blackmail. They are saying relax your rules or we leave.
40mgmelatonindeep on
Claiming that not submitting completely to AI enshittification of every consumer product and saas product and allowing it to replace hundreds of thousands of workers equates to China somehow becoming a danger to US sovereignty or kneecapping the US’s ability to defend itself is a braindead take.
We can still invest in AI infrastructure and develop national defense based AI tech without laying the american worker onto the sacrificial altar and banking the entire world economy on AI proliferation.
Its such a bad faith argument by people like Trump/Jensen
Everything_is_wrong on
These companies know they’re selling bullshit that will be worthless in 5 years.
They’re interested in what comes with data centers.
Land.
Pwnag3_Inc on
Ai innovation is ALREADY in China.
That’s why these bastards have raised prices on ram.
Desperate times call for desperate measures.
CelticJewelscapes on
Limits on children working around weaving machines pushed textile innovations overseas.
echo_sang on
Serious question. Is China displacing their people, stealing tax payer dollars, and destroying the environment to push AI onto their people? Because that’s what’s happening in the U.S.
jonisjalopy on
Ah the old „you can’t tax the businesses because then they will just leave!“ argument. Spoiler alert: they never leave.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
20 Kommentare
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang used his first-ever post on X to back a growing industry campaign in support of open-weight artificial intelligence models, joining more than 20 technology companies that argue new restrictions could hurt U.S. competitiveness instead of strengthening national security.
And that’s bad why? Because it makes nvidia less money?
What a shame.
AI restrictions happen more in China than in the US. Mostly recently China has just banned parasocial relationships with AI’s, e.g no dating your chat bots.
Regulation will not be the death of AI innovation in the US, it will be the chaos that is free market developmental chaos that will hinder AI development. There is no centrally planned infrastructure improvements that will support the power needs of AI, in fact the costs are being pushed onto US consumers for competing with the same power supply. The power turbines needed to build new AI data centers are years behind schedule and will unlikely catch up to meet modern demand.
This video goes alot more into it if anyone is interested.
https://youtu.be/Nmjq0Q4yvV8
https://youtu.be/ny_3PRz6Zeg
The cost is more of a factor then restrictions, imo.
At this point, he can say anything because the AI bubble is reaching its climax and ready to pop anytime soon.
If the call to pour everything into AI is because of national security to beat China or other rivals to the punch then we need an Apollo or Manhattan Project and let the government do it, not unreliable ultra rich assholes and multinational corporations.
Why does the Epstein class think we give a shit if China beats us in the AI race? The results of that won’t affect what puts food on our table. I’m getting so sick of out of touch ghouls who own all the media trying to tell us how to feel tbh.
Trump policies are pushing all innovation toward China.
If you have any doubt about China’s ability to surpass the US technically watch a video of the Shanghai Disney ride Pirates of the Caribbean. Seriously. Underwater pirate battles are mind blowing. China has creative and technical skills easily able to do anything we can do and it’s easy to imagine China replacing us on the world stage.
I think it might be because China may want to actually innovate with AI and the like because unlike the US, China seems more interested in developing their nation long term. The US AI market is just that a market of snake oil and smoke focused on extracting wealth. The writing is on the wall for better or worse.
Not like they have a vested interest or anything, nooooo
Maybe he and all the other people pushing for more AI should be the ones living near the data centers
[ Removed by Reddit ]
This is basically blackmail. They are saying relax your rules or we leave.
Claiming that not submitting completely to AI enshittification of every consumer product and saas product and allowing it to replace hundreds of thousands of workers equates to China somehow becoming a danger to US sovereignty or kneecapping the US’s ability to defend itself is a braindead take.
We can still invest in AI infrastructure and develop national defense based AI tech without laying the american worker onto the sacrificial altar and banking the entire world economy on AI proliferation.
Its such a bad faith argument by people like Trump/Jensen
These companies know they’re selling bullshit that will be worthless in 5 years.
They’re interested in what comes with data centers.
Land.
Ai innovation is ALREADY in China.
That’s why these bastards have raised prices on ram.
Desperate times call for desperate measures.
Limits on children working around weaving machines pushed textile innovations overseas.
Serious question. Is China displacing their people, stealing tax payer dollars, and destroying the environment to push AI onto their people? Because that’s what’s happening in the U.S.
Ah the old „you can’t tax the businesses because then they will just leave!“ argument. Spoiler alert: they never leave.