Share.

    17 Kommentare

    1. suspended-sentence on

      >A cyclist who submitted footage of bad driving to the police has also been fined after the same video showed his poor riding.

      >The Leeds-based wheeler had originally uploaded a video to West Yorkshire Police’s Op Snap portal for driving offences, which showed a car passing too close to him in Menston, near Ilkley.

      >But police said the video also captured him „riding without due care and attention“ as he approached a parked car and an oncoming vehicle. A force spokesperson said the distance he gave was „significantly less than the car he reported earlier had given him“.

      >The cyclist was ordered to pay more than £1,200 in fines and court costs when he appeared at Bradford Magistrates‘ Court.

    2. Cultural-Ambition211 on

      £1200 seems like a lot. Is there a split/breakdown between the fine and court costs?

    3. Cyclist doesn’t look like they have right of way based strictly on their own video

    4. Some_Confidence5962 on

      This seems very strange. It was a very slow manoeuvre. Both car and cyclist were under 10mph.

      Cars don’t bunny hop or rabble to main rain balance. The cyclist appears to be in good control. So I don’t understand the danger anyone is saying the cyclist posed here.

      The actual danger moment, if one existed might be before the clip, on the approach. 🤷 

      This logic seems very strange indeed.

    5. Aggravating-Method24 on

      I feel like this isn’t the whole video. 

      ‚car he had reported earlier‘ suggests that the cars in the video aren’t the offending car, and it’s only the cyclists error here, which is a bit unreasonable. That gaps big enough for a cyclist and no one is really at risk of injury. 

      It’s one thing to risk a tight squeeze at low speeds and on a bike, quite another to risk putting a high speed metal box next to a person.

      He could be reporting that car, but that just seems a little too silly, that car had right of way 

    6. Destiny7655 on

      £1200 because they got fined £100 and argued it to the end of the court process presumably

    7. CandidLiterature on

      £1200 is an absolutely insane fine for this offence. In most instances a driver would only get near a fine like this if they’d killed someone.

    8. I dont think the video linked shows the driving the rider complained about, it only shows the bad riding. He should have given way to the oncoming car rather than squeezing through past the parked car. Also potentially leaves his own lane during the manoeuvre but not sure.

      £1200 seems a bit outrageous but I guess it would be the same for a vehicle.

    9. Reporting this when the cyclist was in the wrong was an error on his part. But magistrates courts are a pile of shit. They are overseen by unqualified volunteers. Often making personally influenced judgments. £1200 sounds excessive.

    10. I don’t know if there’s more to this but as a cyclist and based off the video it seems pretty much case closed to me.

      If the parked car is on your side and someone is coming on the opposite side then they have priority. If the parked car was on the other side and the cyclist had priority with the car driving into my lane then I’d be pissed.

    11. Behemothslayer on

      Is he saying that the Volvo was driving badly?? He had a hazard(BMW) on his side of the road and should’ve given way to the Volvo until it was safe to overtake the car on his side. He’s at fault here not the Volvo. As a cyclist I would’ve stopped and let him pass and then overtaken at a safe distance to avoid the risk of a door opening as I can’t see if there’s anyone in the car

    12. I mean the cyclist probably could have stopped, maybe even should have but looks like an uphill cycle so momentum would be playing on their mind. Perhaps slightly naughty, but £1200 fine seems way too high, or its means tested and the guy is absolutely loaded

    13. Shame it wasn’t footage of them running a red light, „because bikes don’t injure people“

    Leave A Reply