Nur wenige Stunden nach dem WM-Halbfinale wird der Royal Navy ein „militärischer Einmarsch in argentinische Gewässer“ vorgeworfen

    https://www.gbnews.com/news/falkland-islands-royal-navy-military-incursion-argentina

    Von B0797S458W

    Share.

    33 Kommentare

    1. TurbulentBullfrog829 on

      That’s how you troll properly.  Not by holding up a stupid banner. 

    2. “The vessel, which was „illegally stationed in the Malvinas Islands“, had made its way into Argentina’s waters earlier this month without telling the Argentines, the statement claimed.”

      Oh shut up. You don’t even have a functioning navy.

    3. terryjuicelawson on

      >Last night, the Argentine Foreign Ministry issued a furious statement revealing it had lodged a „formal note of protest“ with the British embassy over the movements of HMS Medway.

      Lol, ok then. Let’s face it, nothing actually happened here and the rest of the article is them having another pointless rant about these islands.

    4. >The vessel, which was „illegally stationed in the Malvinas Islands“,

      A vessel stationed in its own territory, by what law is that illegal.

      > had made its way into Argentina’s waters earlier this month without telling the Argentines, the statement claimed.

      I suggest they read UNCLOS Article 19 which states innocent passage is the fundamental right of foreign ships to navigate through another country’s territorial sea. Passage must be continuous, expeditious, and not prejudicial to the peace, good order, or security of the coastal state.

    5. Anderwreckz on

      Yeah I dont exactly trust GB news as a source, considering they frequently misrepresent facts in order to pull in outrage clicks

    6. Must be awkward for GB News, because Milei is so clearly one of their sort, but they have to hate him at the moment so they can wave the flag.

    7. Douglesfield_ on

      Imagine a ship’s crew got so annoyed at the result they just decided to go rogue and invade Argentina

    8. This is probably more because of the comments from the Argentina leadership. So essentially the UK is saying they’ll still defend the Islands.

    9. LycanIndarys on

      >The vessel, which was „illegally stationed in the Malvinas Islands“, had made its way into Argentina’s waters earlier this month without telling the Argentines, the statement claimed.

      >“The Argentine Government firmly rejects this British military incursion into areas under Argentine jurisdiction,“ it bristled.

      How exactly are the waters around the Falklands under Argentinean jurisdiction?

      Look, the claim that the Falklands are Argentinean is obviously stupid, and historically illiterate. But isn’t the claim that Argentina is *currently* in control of them even more bizarre?

      >Finally, it claimed the Navy was „hindering Argentina’s efforts to move towards a peaceful and negotiated solution to the dispute“ – despite a series of provocative statements from Argentine ministers in the last few days alone.

      „How dare you stop us from peacefully invading the island, and forcibly removing the 2000 people that live there“.

    10. Ok-Middle8656 on

      Here we go again. What is it with these tinpot countries and their single issue foreign policies?

    11. Desperate_Humor7652 on

      It’s called the Falkland Islands. It is a British Overseas Territory. I wouldn’t poke the British especially after that ludicrous display called Football. Argentina only became interested in Penguin Island because they realized that there is oil there. We will continue to defend our property like we did last time. They won the match but they will not win a war.

    12. HelloLucrehulk on

      Very hypocritical, Argentina have had a ship stationed near the Falklands for nearly 45 years now, the Belgrano I think it’s called

    13. OneAlexander on

      The problem is it’s not petty Argentine nationalism to the people actually living on the Falkland Islands.

      Argentina more often than not restricts flights to/from the Falklands from using it’s airports/airspace. It also doesn’t allow Falkland-flagged boats to utilise Argentine waters/ports, and often refuses rights of access to general Red Ensign ships, or any flagged ships that have visited/are visiting the Falklands.

      It also often penalises companies that try to work in the Falklands, including oil extraction, sends their fishermen into Falkland waters to take resources, and has lobbied hard to have other South American nations commit to similar policies.

      Which leaves the Falklands literally and politically isolated from their neighbours, depressing their economy, development and tourism, and making it harder for citizens to access practically anything in the region even in an emergency.

      Meanwhile Argentina is in full on cult mode over the islands, from primary schools to universities, street signs, memorials, graffiti, songs, official documents… If it takes 200 years they will still try to take the islands.

    14. andymaclean19 on

      I’m fairly sure that almost the entire population of Argentina is an ‘artificially implanted population’. Same for the USA. It just depends how far back you want to go.

    15. Aggravating-Gene9180 on

      The Falklands were British before Argentina was even a sovereign state.

    16. CharmingTurnover8937 on

      It’s actually really sad that they get excited over stuff like this. The Falklands debate is the only time Argentina gets any attention globally outside of sport.

    17. ChromaticRift on

      Are the Malvinas Islands in the room with us?

      I’m not aware of any such place existing.

    18. selfawareusername on

      I think they’re getting worked up thst the Falklands is about to get oil rich and a failing economy like Argentina could do with that.

    19. SpottedDicknCustard on

      I thought the win might cause them to pipe down a bit. How wrong I was. Sabre rattling twerps.

    20. I love when I expect all the replies to be from raging angry lefties and everyone’s being sensible and on the side of the British

    21. UK Falklands Argentina are getting news every 4 years, and only if it’s England Vs Argentina in the World Cup

    22. FutureTerrible9987 on

      Seems the Argentinians have forgottten about the smashing they got in ’82.

    23. To quote Randy Marsh “What are you gunna do? Huh? Wha’s up? What are you gunna do?”

    24. Present-Dark-9044 on

      The way the Argies players were anti English, like the UTD and Liverpool player, make them rot in the reserves

    25. pajamakitten on

      They won the match but we are living rent-free in their heads and always will. They could not resist holding up a sign at the end of the match and now this. They have to be the biggest sore losers out there.

    26. Expert_Conflict6374 on

      Imagine the outrage if German or Japanese players displayed a flag saying „We didn’t lose WWII“

      They’d be cancelled on the spot.

      From what I can see, the Argentine invaded UK territory in an unprovoked attack, we lost more than 200+ servicemen in the war, and they are the one crying and feeling injustice?

      This is not just individual footballer, it’s state sanctioned anti-defeat sentiment seen in the Japanese far right but on a national scale. It’s not right that we are not doing some sort of diplomatic sanction, at minimum those players should be banned.

    Leave A Reply