Mann muss 20.000 US-Dollar Schadenersatz zahlen, weil er intime Bilder einer Frau ohne Zustimmung weitergegeben hat
https://www.ctvnews.ca/vancouver/article/man-shared-womans-intimate-images-to-gain-social-media-exposure-tribunal/
Mann muss 20.000 US-Dollar Schadenersatz zahlen, weil er intime Bilder einer Frau ohne Zustimmung weitergegeben hat
https://www.ctvnews.ca/vancouver/article/man-shared-womans-intimate-images-to-gain-social-media-exposure-tribunal/
23 Kommentare
> In response to the (woman’s) requests to not post the videos, (Elbishlawi) either ignored those requests or insisted on meeting (the woman) in person first because, as he stated, ‘I don’t do favors for strangers.’
„But I’ll happily post an upskirt video of you without your consent.“
I remember hearing a case where some 19 year old was dating a 16 year old and got mad that she broke up with him.
His dumb ass proceeds to send her nudes to other classmates, her administrators and parents…
What he failed to think through was that he was technically distributing child pornography. Things did not go well for him after that.
Edit: State of Ohio v. Caleb L.
How did they determine the $20,000 number?
Good. Fuck him. One of the worst things you can do to someone
[removed]
I saw the name of the article and knew immediately that it wasn’t in the United States.
Not a big enough fine.
Holy shit. Only fans models should find their leaks and just make twice as much
These damages need to be a *lot* higher. Like, a life-changing amount higher.
Where them images at though.
Some good news, then.
It didn’t include 30 days in jail?
That’s not enough money imo
20k for punitive consideration – is that all? Men: if this was your daughter or sister, would you feel justice has been served?
$20k is light, fuck this. Way more than $20k worth of emotional distress for that woman.
$20k for a guy with 100k followers who made dozens of these videos is basically a licensing fee.
what photos ?
Interesting case. Not the usual revenge porn-type of situation.
Also, this explanation of what constitutes intimate images in British Columbia: „Defines an intimate image as one in which someone is ’nude or nearly nude, engaging in a sexual act, or with visible genital organs, anal region, or breasts.'“
So photos of someone in a swimsuit or bikini at a beach or a pool are intimate images?
Insert that “***more***” gif here
Should be paying a lot more than $20,000
So she got onlyfans payment without signing up. what a shitty ruling.
There should always be a fine for this
20k not nearly enough.