„Auch nach der Tat hat er Frau Sato blutüberströmt gefilmt“: Staatsanwalt fordert 20 Jahre Haft für 44-jährigen Mann aus Tokio, der während der Live-Übertragung eines Videos eine Frau ermordet hat.

    https://news.yahoo.co.jp/pickup/6587398

    Share.

    9 Kommentare

    1. Stufilover69 on

      This time the yahoo commenters ask themselves: „Is killing people bad?“

      The answer turns out to be: not if it was a (manipulative) woman

    2. Okay so I can understand the stabbing and all since he was in a bad situation and whatever, it might have made sense in his mind somehow but how come he live streamed it? How did that idea even come to mind?

    3. TypicalCurve9341 on

      the comments here are insane, she was a hostess and a streamer, that’s a job, it doesn’t mean she deserved to be murdered over that. Male hosts are way worse and actually even pimp out the women yet no one is murdering them or making excuses to murder them.

      Its not her fault that this guy gave his money to a streamer and she doesn’t owe him the money back.

      Also very telling this guy went to young hot hostesses instead of a woman his age or appearance but that’s a topic that we don’t want to start since incels will get mad.

    4. Top_Conflict_337 on

      I watched this video a while ago explaining this case: „Young Female Streamer Gets Life Taken in Japan, Then Much of the Public Defends the Murderer- Why?“ (not sure if I can link it) 

      He gives the reasons why a large portion of the Japanese online sided with the murder. 

      edit: I ended up rewatching the video, below is a summary of the situation:

      This guy was a top donor on her stream. At some point, she gave him the her number. Then she asks for multiple loans through DMs, promising she will pay him back. While at it she emotionally manipulated him with stuff like „I can’t live without you“ or „I love you“, to us it might seem obvious that she was just milking him as much as she could, bit the guy was way too naive sadly. This guy had a problem where he couldn’t say no to people, so she realised this and started increasing the amount she „loaned“ over time, to the point where the guy lost his entire life savings.

      When she kept asking for more money but the guy didn’t have any, she manipulated him into borrowing money from companies to keep „loaning“ her money. All while promising she would absolutely pay him back. She also made some crazy stories to guilt trip him into giving her money.

      The guy didn’t have any money for basic things like eating and was living in poverty for some time (1/2/3 years, don’t remember this detail).

      So he filed a lawsuit to make her give the money she borrowed and that she promised would repay (not including the money he willingly donated to her in her livestreams). he won the lawsuit. She claimed she didn’t have any money and didn’t pay what she was ordered by the court. It’s hard to believe this when she was posting pictures of luxurious apartments and food to her social media.

      The guy continued to live in extreme poverty until he reached a breaking point, and he sent her a final message begging her to at least give him a tiny sum of money monthly so he could eat. She ghosted him.

      After all this is when the murder happened.

      The Japanese apperantly give extreme importance to paying back favours and this is even more true when borrowing money. So her actions are like, the polar opposite of Japanese values.

      Try searching in YouTube: 佐藤愛里 刺殺 Click any video. Then use the YT feature to translate comments. You’ll probably not find a single person defending her.

      Most say stuff like „It’s what you get for not returning what you borrowed etc“ Some more extreme even say the the guy shouldn’t receive any prison time and that she deserved to die for what she has done.

    5. It’s amazing to me, how everyone can spend hours online defending the guy who shot Shinzo Abe, because of the Unification Church manipulating his mom into giving up everything and forcing him to live in poverty.

      Here we have the exact same thing, except this time it’s a pretty girl, and now there’s no excuse and he’s a monster?

      Yes, he was naive, but the second it went from Streaming donations to her DM’ing him and asking him to borrow money and swearing she would pay him back, even when he wasn’t able to afford basic necessities? He’s still guilty but I’m not gonna pretend she didn’t reap what she sowed.

      If any of you cheered for Luigi for what he did to the health insurance exec, but call this guy a monster, you’re a hypocrite.

    Leave A Reply