Eine neue Studie legt nahe, dass ein Verfechter der Solarenergie im Haus der Schlüssel zur Installation der Module ist. Das Verständnis dieser Familiendynamik könnte dem Planeten helfen, indem die Akzeptanzrate von Solarenergie für Wohngebäude in den USA um 8 % gesteigert wird, sagen Forscher.
https://news.osu.edu/what-every-household-debating-rooftop-solar-needs-a-champion/
29 Kommentare
Study published in Nature Energy: [https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-026-02104-8](https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-026-02104-8)
Between the local utilities anti-solar practices and the sketchy solar panel installation companies, I think the barrier to entry for me is the feeling that no matter what I do, I’ll end up paying for the panels, the install, the maintenance, and then still pay high energy bills. That’s why, despite the science and my desire to live responsibly, I still haven’t even started looking into home solar.
Isn’t it safe to say that having a champion for anything in a household makes it more likely than not having one?
Not having anyone in the house wanting solar reduces the likelihood of the house getting solar. Going out to dinner is more likely to happen if someone wants to go out to dinner. There is even a quote talking about getting a dog in the article.
Grants and funded research are finite, and to have something like this that genuinely is one of those obvious outcomes boggles my mind a bit.
Now how can apply this to municipalities? We have parking lots *everywhere* and I’m always reminded of photos of parking lots that are also mini solar farms. Provide shade and also generate electricity.
Adoption dropped tremendously after Net Metering 3.0 in CA. Use it or lose it doesn’t pay back very well.
Realistically, we should be moving towards utility scale solar. They tend to be more efficient and avoid the problem of everyone in the neighborhood having to find someone to install and get permits.
Look, give me the money to do it and I’ll do it. But my #1 stopping point isn’t a ‘champion’ in the house, it’s disposable income. Saving on energy bills means nothing if I can’t afford my next 10 mortgage payments.
The biggest problem with solar adoption in the US seems like the scammy door to door solar sales where they tell you your state government will pay for your solar panels and then they put a lien on your house. It makes the whole industry seem untrustworthy
The solar industry needs to police the scammers out of it. A big barrier to adopting here is just that the companies oversell and under deliver and damage people’s property and for residential adopters the word spreads quick that solar is a huge risk.
No it’s the cost. Make it free.
For me it’s the fact that it’ll cost me thousands of dollars plus the cost of a battery to make it all worthwhile. There are exactly zero incentives in Wisconsin, too. I’d love solar but it’s not in the cards for the moment.
To drive it they need to create a strategy for landlords to feel it’s worth investing in. They have no reason to buy it.
I’d pay an extra 200 a month in rent for a house with full solar that didn’t require the grid.
Having someone that wants to install solar panels leads to high solar panel adoption
The biggest barriers to adoption of solar are the ones intentionally put in place by utilities providers and the complicated landscape of installers
We need solar panel scrum leaders
Recent video by the youtube channel „Technology Connections“ really changed my mind on the matter
My berry of Entry is money. So unless I get a free solar panels installed, I can’t afford it.
How about we do something about all the weird, sketchy, scammy installation companies first?
Also, make power storage a standard component of solar installations. I don’t care if that’s through a home battery, or V2H, or whatever. I don’t want solar just for the reduction in cost. I also want it as a continuity plan.
If the entire home solar industry wasn’t fraudulent and bad for my roof, I’d have installed one a long time ago.
A champion and a mattress full of money.
I’ll do it if I can own the solar panels and the energy they produce. Sounds to me like companies now treat them like digital media, something to rent and never own. Is that accurate, or am I imagining this?
The predatory practices of the solar companies are a big deterant. I cant self finance installation. The solar companies want 25 year deals. It is insane. And they want to own your roof. Like no. It woyld be awesome if the deals had better terms and it was less complicated. Its a big deal. Then there is the battery and upgrading my home’s service.
In the US, it’s just way too expensive. I installed a 9.6kW system with 1 Powerwall + Expansion on my previous home. The cost was $33k after the tax credit, installed. The installation itself was painless, my electric bill vanished (I only had to pay the grid connection fee each month), and my batteries provided while-home backup without a single hiccup.
No I’m in a home that’s double the size of that one. To install solar on this house with whole-home battery backup? I’m probably looking at $60k+. It’s just not affordable. I don’t want to lease, the tax incentives are gone, and I don’t want to take out a 10+ year loan. Prices need to come down. Solar adoption will remain low until it’s more affordable.
Wow, so if a major, elective project is going to get done on a house, a person who lives in the house needs to want to do the thing first? I would have never connected these dots. Interesting that the key to increasing interest in a subject is likely marketing. Glad these scientists are asking the right questions!
Residential solar isn’t the solution, really. It would make much more sense for solar farms to be done at scale, just as it’s already being done. There’s simply too much upkeep, too much burden on each homeowner for maintenance, repair, and overall cost to ignore the efficiency of large solar installations.
In many places, mine included, trees make good shade, blocking the sun from beating directly on the house, thus reducing the burden on the HVAC system, lowering electricity usage, and extending the life of the unit. Placing solar panels on the roof assumes you have direct sunlight on your roof. Then there’s the added costs of roof repair/replacement when that time comes, batteries that have to be placed somewhere in your home, and of course replacing the whole system at some point when it fails or becomes hopelessly obsolete. Centralizing solar installations eliminates these problems for homeowners and overall costs are reduced. At least in theory, as corruption seems to be unavoidable, so in reality it’s probably just going to be a new excuse to increase prices.
However, practically, I get why people would want one, as they create some amount of independence from the grid.
Can someone explain to me why it is even desirable to have millions of individual small-scale roof installations at unoptimized angles on house roofs, where prices are negotiated individually with a hoard of contractors rather than just filling the nearest corn field or empty lot with them? This push for residential solar makes zero sense to me.
Oh this was so very true several years ago. The local electricity monopoly has decided to make this much less optimal and the government has taken away a once great financial incentive. I got mine when the getting was good and it made perfect sense. I’ve met my break even point as expected and was right about my decision. It’s hard for me to recommend that same decision today. Such a shame that greed has thwarted an otherwise long term, self sustaining green technology.
This isn’t science this is basic logical conclusions
It would also help if the solar salesmen didn’t act like snake oil sellers.
If we want improved residential adoption, then the panels and installation just need to be a whole lot cheaper.