Share.

    7 Kommentare

    1. Gné ? Avoir des droits sur des oeuvres produites je comprends le concept, mais sur des oeuvres qui n’existent pas encore c’est pas clair…

    2. That_one_drunk_dude on

      Ragebait. SABAM did not hold any ‚copyright‘ as if they as an organisation were profiting from any copyright payments (they’re obviously non-profit, for one). The Belgian law was extremely strict on images of architectural works and SABAM by law was mandated to collect payment on these protections. This law was changed in 2016.

      SABAM may deserve a lot of hate on their awful customer service and delayed payments, but if you have complaints about their general mission and mandate, you should point it towards the government as they’re just operating as ordered by federal copyright law.

    3. The French found that a great idea and came up with their own version:

      The Eiffel Tower is in the public domain during the day, so you can freely share or sell photos. However, the nighttime light show (introduced in 1985) is protected by copyright. Publishing or using images of the illuminated tower for commercial purposes requires prior permission and payment of fees to the operating company (SETE).

    4. Next they will plant a chip in our head to not see the copy righted things until we pay.

    Leave A Reply