Milliarden Dosen später: Globale Überprüfung bestätigt, dass mRNA-Impfstoffe sicher, wirksam und vielversprechend sind. Eine umfassende Überprüfung bündelt weltweite Erkenntnisse, um das Vertrauen der Öffentlichkeit zu stärken und Fehlinformationen entgegenzuwirken, da mRNA-Impfstoffe zur Vorbeugung und Behandlung weiterer Krankheiten eingesetzt werden.
15 Kommentare
Billions of doses later: Global review confirms mRNA vaccines are safe, effective and full of promise
**Comprehensive review brings together global evidence to strengthen public trust and counter misinformation as mRNA vaccines expand to prevent and treat more diseases.**
A sweeping global review led by researchers at the University of British Columbia has found that mRNA vaccines—now administered billions of times worldwide—are safe and highly effective at preventing infectious diseases like COVID-19, and have potential applications for a range of other diseases, including influenza, RSV, cancer and autoimmune disorders.
Published today in [*The Lancet*](https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(26)00512-X/fulltext), the review draws on laboratory science, clinical trials and real-world effectiveness data to provide one of the most comprehensive assessments of mRNA vaccines to date. It spans the full vaccine lifecycle, from design and manufacturing to real-world performance and monitoring.
By bringing this evidence together in a single resource, the researchers aim to support healthcare providers, policymakers and the public with clear, evidence-based information as new mRNA vaccines and therapies are developed.
“After billions of doses, we now have an extraordinary amount of scientific evidence,” said lead author Dr. [Anna Blakney](https://www.msl.ubc.ca/people/dr-anna-blakney/), assistant professor at UBC’s Michael Smith Laboratories and School of Biomedical Engineering. “This review affirms that mRNA vaccines are a safe and highly effective platform, supported by rigorous testing and real-world monitoring. It provides an evidence-based foundation as this technology continues to expand into new areas of medicine.”
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(26)00512-X/abstract
Was this research needed? Yes, yes it was.
But no amount of peer-reviewed investigation is going to convince antivaxxers that they are in the wrong.
Too bad vaccines aren’t in the bible. It would be so much easier then. Can’t we just add a chapter like the people who wrote it did?
I’m sure antivaxers are now convinced now that we have all the science.
As written, this isn’t the flex they think it is. It’s basically admitting that they used them before confirming they were safe and effective. Which we knew, because it was obvious they didn’t know whether there would be long term side effects, because it wasn’t possible for there to have been any long term studies.
This could have so easily gone the other way, causing birth defects, delayed onset encephalopathy or similar, and I’m not sure the pharmaceutical companies appreciate how lucky they got.
Maybe this should have been done first
This much is certain, the people who need to see this, wont.
And if they do, will still reject it out of fear of admitting they were wrong.
But Aunt Sally found something linked on Facebook and clearly that is worth equal consideration, otherwise you’re “not respecting all opinions.”
Make one for Herpes and people will line right up for a shot.
>confirms
This is not a scientific term.
Sadly this will largely fall on deaf ears. The people who need to hear this the most “do their own research”
Butt I read in Facebook that everyone that got a vaccine will die and I’ve been hiding in my basement for 5 years!
Didn’t everyone die?
Excellent update. I look forward to more innovations using mRNA technology
We can file that under “No Sh*t Sherlock” considering we have been working on mRNA vaccines from the early 2000s.
Greys anatomy had this as a story line like 15 years ago