Share.

    15 Kommentare

    1. I was going to say no way, but then saw the bottom (adjusted for inflation). I’m surprised Illinois is so low.

    2. This doesn’t seem correct. Even adjusted for inflation those percentages are very low for a 25 year time frame.

      For reference, a typical investment would be around 300-400% for a 25 year time frame

      Looking at the posted sources, one was from 1990-2000 and the other was 2020-2025.

      Those percentages look correct for 2020-2025 though.

      Edit: I suppose an inflation adjusted investment would be more like 100-200% over 25 years

    3. Wow this is so sad to look at. Just shocking I want to cry. In Canada it was like 300% maybe 400%? I weep trying to pay off my mortgage realizing how good other have it.

    4. Doesn’t seem sustainable when billionaires are sucking up all the money that is printed.

    5. Do you think, that maybe treating something that everyone needs as something to invest in might be a bad idea?

    6. Id like to see illinois broken up into chicagoland vs the rest of the state

    7. Has anyone read any research/history on what poor housing affordability could mean in the long-term, for example from when it happened in the past and other spots in the world?

    8. maps like these are definitely interesting but for states like new york, and california, and to a lesser extent illinois, and massachusetts etc. that have highly desirable and wildly expensive urban centers but also less desirable rural areas, it sort of paints a less clear picture. 

      upstate and western new york are VERY different places than nyc, long island, and wearchester/putman/dutchess counties. same for western vs eastern mass, etc. 

    9. would be cool to see it adjusted for median income and population growth rather than just inflation

    Leave A Reply